Revising acute care systems and processes to improve breastfeeding and maternal postnatal health: a pre and post intervention study in one English maternity unit

Abstract

BackgroundMost women in the UK give birth in a hospital labour ward, following which they are transferred to a postnatal ward and discharged home within 24 to 48 hours of the birth. Despite policy and guideline recommendations to support planned, effective postnatal care, national surveys of women’s views of maternity care have consistently found in-patient postnatal care, including support for breastfeeding, is poorly rated.MethodsUsing a Continuous Quality Improvement approach, routine antenatal, intrapartum and postnatal care systems and processes were revised to support implementation of evidence based postnatal practice. To identify if implementation of a multi-faceted QI intervention impacted on outcomes, data on breastfeeding initiation and duration, maternal health and women’s views of care, were collected in a pre and post intervention longitudinal survey. Primary outcomes included initiation, overall duration and duration of exclusive breastfeeding. Secondary outcomes included maternal morbidity, experiences and satisfaction with care. As most outcomes of interest were measured on a nominal scale, these were compared pre and post intervention using logistic regression.ResultsData were obtained on 741/1160 (64%) women at 10 days post-birth and 616 (54%) at 3 months post-birth pre-intervention, and 725/1153 (63%) and 575 (50%) respectively post-intervention. Post intervention there were statistically significant differences in the initiation (p = 0.050), duration of any breastfeeding (p = 0.020) and duration of exclusive breastfeeding to 10 days (p = 0.038) and duration of any breastfeeding to three months (p = 0.016). Post intervention, women were less likely to report physical morbidity within the first 10 days of birth, and were more positive about their in-patient care.ConclusionsIt is possible to improve outcomes of routine in-patient care within current resources through continuous quality improvement.

Expectations and experiences of hospital postnatal care in the UK: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies

“…Of these studies, two were RCTs,32 40 one was a non-randomised controlled study,36 a further study was a before–after intervention study,19 and another three33 37 41 were cohort studies. The remaining 27 studies were cross-sectional surveys, 20 of which were national surveys with sample sizes ranging from 113734 to 26 325 30.…”

Continuous quality improvement and metabolic screening during pregnancy at primary health centres attended by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women

“…Most previous CQI research in pregnancy care has been hospital-based, implemented in a single service, not focused on metabolic screening, or not conducted in Australia. [23][24][25] Our research applied a unique systemwide participatory approach to assess systemic issues commonly affecting provision of care. 14 It used a detailed, longitudinal dataset to investigate long-term sustainability, and included many PHCs across several settings.…”

Enhancing recognition of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in six maternity units in Palestine: an interventional quality improvement study

“…Another speculative assumption is that midwives, who delivered the majority of parous women, have less knowledge in perineal anatomy and therefore tend to miss OASIS more than doctors. 31 Zimmo et al 17 described that after the expert workshop 54% midwives reported good knowledge of perineal anatomy compared with 79% doctors. This may also justify the higher OASIS rates observed in births attended by doctors.…”