2017
DOI: 10.1002/mus.25430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revised upper limb module for spinal muscular atrophy: Development of a new module

Abstract: The resulting RULM scale shows good reliability and validity, making it a suitable tool to assess upper extremity function in the SMA population for multi-center clinical research. Muscle Nerve 55: 869-874, 2017.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
202
0
7

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(228 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
202
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The physical therapists in the participating clinics received the same training programs with establishment of yearly intra and inter‐rater reliability, and standardized procedures of scale administration. Inter and intra observer reliability of the RULM of the same examiners have been reported …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The physical therapists in the participating clinics received the same training programs with establishment of yearly intra and inter‐rater reliability, and standardized procedures of scale administration. Inter and intra observer reliability of the RULM of the same examiners have been reported …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RULM includes a number of additional items that expand the spectrum of upper limb activities included in the ULM in order to reduce the risk of ceiling effect in stronger children. The revised scale has been shown to measure the same construct as the original ULM and has shown robust psychometric properties . While this reliability, validity and suitability of the scale in a multi‐center clinical research setting have been published, there is yet no longitudinal data on the RULM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the HFMSE and RULM have a body of literature supporting their use in SMA with training and reliability, they can be problematic for a few reasons. First, an evaluator‐rated ordinal scale may be less responsive to change as large improvements in function may be required to improve the total score and have potential floor and ceiling effects in various SMA cohorts . Additionally, these outcomes require significant training and reliability to ensure consistent administration and scoring across sites .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6] Several insurers in the USA have published criteria for issuing approvals for treatment contingent on documented improvement or stabilization. 7 Outcomes have been developed to capture the natural history of SMA, such as the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded (HFMSE), 4 Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM), 8 and patient-reported outcomes that use a subjective, ordinal scoring system to grade function. While the HFMSE and RULM have a body of literature supporting their use in SMA with training and reliability, they can be problematic for a few reasons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%