1963
DOI: 10.1145/366193.366201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revised report on the algorithmic language ALGOL 60

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
2

Year Published

1964
1964
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 583 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The call-by-name evaluation is adopted in Algol 60 [4] but its efficiency is not sufficient for practical usage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The call-by-name evaluation is adopted in Algol 60 [4] but its efficiency is not sufficient for practical usage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Call-by-name evaluation was originally proposed in ALGOL 60 [4]. Call-by-value and call-by-name evaluation strategies were formalized as small-step semantics by Plotkin [8].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CALGO mandated the use of Algol 60 [41] as its implementation language until the publication of the ASA standard for Fortran in 1966 [4], when the revised Algorithm Policy [25] allowed both languages. Surprisingly, the first published algorithm in Fortran did not appear until 1968 [58].…”
Section: Implementation Languagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SPL syntax is presented in Figure 2 using an extended Backus-Naur Form [12]. We represent terminals as term, tokens as token, alternation with {one | two}, optional elements as [optional], elements which must repeat once or more as (term)+ and elements which may appear never or many times as (term)*.…”
Section: Syntax and Typing Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%