2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2020.107181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revised and extended benchmark results for Rayleigh scattering of sunlight in spherical atmospheres

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sophisticated variance reduction methods have been implemented (Buras and Mayer, 2011) which enable the calculation of radiances for scattering media characterized by strongly peaked phase functions without any approximations. The MYSTIC model has been validated in various model intercomparison studies (Cahalan et al, 2005;Kokhanovsky et al, 2010a;Emde et al, 2015Emde et al, , 2018Korkin et al, 2020;Zawada et al, 2021) and by comparison to benchmark results and always agreed well to other participating radiative transfer codes.…”
Section: Three-dimensional Radiative Transfer Model Mysticmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Sophisticated variance reduction methods have been implemented (Buras and Mayer, 2011) which enable the calculation of radiances for scattering media characterized by strongly peaked phase functions without any approximations. The MYSTIC model has been validated in various model intercomparison studies (Cahalan et al, 2005;Kokhanovsky et al, 2010a;Emde et al, 2015Emde et al, , 2018Korkin et al, 2020;Zawada et al, 2021) and by comparison to benchmark results and always agreed well to other participating radiative transfer codes.…”
Section: Three-dimensional Radiative Transfer Model Mysticmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Sophisticated variance reduction methods have been implemented (Buras and Mayer, 2011) which enable the calculation of unbiased radiances for scattering media characterized by strongly peaked phase functions without any approximations. The MYSTIC model has been validated in various model intercomparison studies (Cahalan et al, 2005;Kokhanovsky et al, 2010a;Emde et al, 2015Emde et al, , 2018Korkin et al, 2020;Zawada et al, 2021) and by comparison to benchmark results, and always agreed perfectly to the core of participating radiative transfer codes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Following Ceamanos et al (2021), SEVIRI radiances were recalibrated to account for the systematic biases found by Meirink et al (2013) with respect to collocated near-nadir reflectance measurements from MODIS. Furthermore, SEVIRI measurements with a value of SZA or VZA higher than 75° were discarded to mitigate the lower accuracy of the RTM used in iAERUS-GEO at these geometries and the neglect of the sphericity of the Earth (Korkin et al, 2020). Finally, the greater difficulty of retrieving AOD in the presence of intense sun glint is solved by not processing ocean measurements with a sun glint angle (γ) lower than 35°, where γ = arccos(𝜇 % 𝜇 1 − sin 𝜃 % sin 𝜃 1 cos 𝜑).…”
Section: Input Datamentioning
confidence: 99%