Abstract:It is argued that although uncertainty can be reduced, it can never be completely eliminated from decision-making. Therefore most decision-making performed in medicine contains an irreducible intuitive element and is thus vulnerable to these biases and heuristics. Given that few medical curricula overtly address the process of medical decision-making, both medical students and physicians remain vulnerable to these effects on their own (and their patients') decision-making. Insight via education appears the maj… Show more
“…This is consistent with the evidence that clinicians rely on biases and heuristics in decisionmaking, and these factors ("intuitive" decision making 24 ) play a larger role as uncertainty increases 25 . The impact of the new USPSTF guidelines on CRC screening practices in the VA system is yet to be determined, and it would be interesting to compare our findings with data collected after the publication of the guidelines.…”
“…This is consistent with the evidence that clinicians rely on biases and heuristics in decisionmaking, and these factors ("intuitive" decision making 24 ) play a larger role as uncertainty increases 25 . The impact of the new USPSTF guidelines on CRC screening practices in the VA system is yet to be determined, and it would be interesting to compare our findings with data collected after the publication of the guidelines.…”
“…6 In the West, the value of reasoned thinking has been extolled since the Enlightenment 7 and strengthened by evidence that intuition can be prone to producing biased or inaccurate judgments. 8,9 However, evidence-based medicine also recognizes that clinical expertise, including intuition, is needed to integrate the clinical state and circumstances, research evidence, and patient preferences and actions. 10 Moreover, discrimination between subtle stimuli and integrative processing are central to clinical skills such as ultrasonography 11 and are highly valued [12][13][14] by the patient-centered clinical method, which uses patient experience to help guide clinical interactions and shared decision making.…”
As a style of information processing, intuition involves implicit perceptual and cognitive processes that can be quickly and automatically executed without conscious mental will, such that people know more than they can describe. Patient intuition can influence patient and clinician decision-making and behavior. However, physicians may not always see patient intuition as credible or important, and its management in the clinical setting is poorly understood. This paper takes a step toward suggesting conditions under which patient intuition should be taken seriously. These conditions relate to the credibility or accuracy of the intuitive beliefs held by the patient, and their significance to the patient. Credibility may be increased when the intuitions of patients (1) reflect their individualized knowledge, (2) can complement the common absence of scientific evidence in managing health problems, and (3) can quickly and effectively process key information in complex cognitive tasks. Even intuitions that lack credibility can be subjectively rational and meaningful to patients, and help to shape the decisions they and clinicians make.
“…Such biases are frequently related to the use of cognitive heuristics (Hall, 2002;Tversky & Kahneman, 1974) and prototypes in clinical decision-making (Garb, 2005). Heuristics have been described as "...a rule or guideline that is easily applied to make complex tasks more simple" (Detmer, Fryback, & Gassner, 1978, p. 682).…”
Section: Diagnostic Decision-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heuristics have been described as "...a rule or guideline that is easily applied to make complex tasks more simple" (Detmer, Fryback, & Gassner, 1978, p. 682). As such, heuristics may be considered decision-making short-cuts that, although expeditious, can lead to decreased decisional accuracy (Hall, 2002).…”
Depersonalization Disorder (DPD) is considered both under-researched and underdiagnosed. A variety of reasons have been proposed for the under-diagnosis of DPD, including the high frequency of depersonalization as a symptom and comorbidity of DPD with other disorders. Under-diagnosis of DPD has also been attributed to inadequate diagnostic criteria in the DSM-IV-TR, as it lists only four criteria and only one specifically addresses the phenomenon of depersonalization. Several groups of researchers have proposed more comprehensive and in-depth conceptualizations of DPD. Further, common biases in clinical decision-making, such as an over-reliance on cognitive heuristics and the use of prototypes, can contribute to inaccurate diagnosis and under-diagnosis. A national sample of licensed psychologists was randomly selected and recruited from the membership of the American Psychological Association. The study was conducted on-line and participants were asked to read one of two DPD cases, assign a diagnosis, and rate the representativeness of a series of diagnoses for the case. They were also asked to rate the presence of a list of symptoms, including the DSM-IV-TR and ICD-10 criteria for DPD, and the symptoms and dimensions of DPD and depersonalization from the literature. Half of the participants were asked to assign a diagnosis and then rate symptoms (simulated prototype approach) while the others rated the symptoms before assigning a diagnosis (simulated DSM-IV approach). The study found that clinicians under-diagnosed DPD and that the DSM-IV depersonalization criterion had high sensitivity but not adequate specificity. Results indicated that a simulated DSM-IV approach
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.