Reviewing A&Is and Aggregators in a Large Research Library Collection

Abstract

To facilitate discovery, libraries have traditionally subscribed to many specialized subject abstracting and indexing databases (A&Is), as well as aggregator packages with A&I function and full-text content. Library collection staff must continue to demonstrate effective and responsible stewardship of the library's acquisitions budget by using evidence to inform collection development decisions. Using COUNTER statistics, title lists, the Gold Rush overlap review tool, and feedback from colleagues, review teams at University of Toronto Libraries analyzed a select list of A&Is and aggregators to confirm if subscription renewal is necessary. Involving staff from various departments resulted in a deeper understanding of database use and assisted in deciding not to renew. The review methodology will be used in future reviews, and analysis tools will be shared for future collection development decisions. Discontinuing subscriptions allows us to redirect funds for new resources.