2004
DOI: 10.1093/em/32.4.621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review: The Classical clarinet: Albert R. Rice, The clarinet in the Classical period

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That of Tausch's relative neglect is worthy of a little more consideration. With the exception of broad studies of organology and repertoire by Hoeprich and Rice, 102 the historiography of the clarinet in the eighteenth and nineteenth century is dominated by a handful of individuals whose posthumous, iconic status is defined by their position as 'muses' to particular composers: Anton Stadler and Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, Heinrich Baermann and Carl Maria von Weber, Johann Simon Hermstedt and Louis Spohr, and later in the nineteenth century, Richard Mühlfeld and Johannes Brahms. 103 This is of course a reflection of a musicology that until recently was structured around the canon and a hierarchy that placed composition above performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That of Tausch's relative neglect is worthy of a little more consideration. With the exception of broad studies of organology and repertoire by Hoeprich and Rice, 102 the historiography of the clarinet in the eighteenth and nineteenth century is dominated by a handful of individuals whose posthumous, iconic status is defined by their position as 'muses' to particular composers: Anton Stadler and Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, Heinrich Baermann and Carl Maria von Weber, Johann Simon Hermstedt and Louis Spohr, and later in the nineteenth century, Richard Mühlfeld and Johannes Brahms. 103 This is of course a reflection of a musicology that until recently was structured around the canon and a hierarchy that placed composition above performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%