2020
DOI: 10.1111/camh.12437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review: Puberty blockers for transgender and gender diverse youth—a critical review of the literature

Abstract: Background: Increasingly, early adolescents who are transgender or gender diverse (TGD) are seeking genderaffirming healthcare services. Pediatric healthcare providers supported by professional guidelines are treating many of these children with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa), which reversibly block pubertal development, giving the child and their family more time in which to explore the possibility of medical transition. Methods: We conducted a critical review of the literature to answer a se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(70 reference statements)
0
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrast Rew et al.’s (2021) conclusions with another recently completed systematic review of puberty blockers for GD youth, commissioned by England’s NHS and conducted by The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2020). The NICE review concluded that studies investigating the benefits or adverse effects of GnRH analogs (puberty blockers) were of “very low certainty using modified GRADE.” They noted that any outcome differences that were found could have represented changes of “questionable clinical value,” or, as the studies themselves were “not reliable,” could have been “due to confounding, bias or chance.” They suggest that if controlled studies are not possible, then reliable comparative studies are required.…”
Section: Brief Description Of Rew Et Al’s (2021) Studymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Contrast Rew et al.’s (2021) conclusions with another recently completed systematic review of puberty blockers for GD youth, commissioned by England’s NHS and conducted by The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2020). The NICE review concluded that studies investigating the benefits or adverse effects of GnRH analogs (puberty blockers) were of “very low certainty using modified GRADE.” They noted that any outcome differences that were found could have represented changes of “questionable clinical value,” or, as the studies themselves were “not reliable,” could have been “due to confounding, bias or chance.” They suggest that if controlled studies are not possible, then reliable comparative studies are required.…”
Section: Brief Description Of Rew Et Al’s (2021) Studymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Si bien el objetivo principal de este consenso no comprende el manejo de los individuos con incongruencia/disforia de género menores de edad, se destinó un apartado especial en tres temas esenciales en este grupo etario: 1) Criterios para uso de bloqueadores de la pubertad, los cuales fueron obtenidos de la revisión de literatura realizada por Rew et al (13) en 2021, 2) Criterios para el inicio de la terapia hormonal cruzada reportados y obtenidos de Edwards-Leeper et al (14) y 3) El algoritmo de manejo para abordaje del recién nacido con genitales atípicos-asignación de sexo certero (figura 1), el cual fue tomado del libro "Disforia de género" en su capítulo "Cómo abordar la inconformidad/ incongruencia de género relacionado con la salud sexual en niños, niñas y adolescentes", escrito por Chahín (15).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Access to timely gender-affirming care is associated with improved mental health outcomes and overall wellbeing. 17,18 The erosion of the concept of Gillick competency diminishes the personal autonomy and agency of trans youth and directly affects their ability to access this care.…”
Section: Clinical Implications Of Re Imogenmentioning
confidence: 99%