1978
DOI: 10.1007/bf00115515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review paper: Solid 3He: A magnet in search of a Hamiltonian

Abstract: The physics of the solid 3He magnetic problem is reviewed. The data base includes C(T, 0), P(T, 0), P(T, H), X, S(T, 0), S(T, H), and the location of the magnetic phase transition on the melting curve. This data base permits determination of only two moments of the magnetic Hamiltonian, Jx~z and jx2x.Contrary to conventional wisdom, the moment J3xx cannot be reliably determined from the data. As there is no model-independent theory for the analysis of magnetic data near Tc, the data base is limited to giving t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1980
1980
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our experiment H/T varies from 0.03 to 0.28 T/mK and Prewitt and Goodkind have shown that the susceptibility is field independent for H/T from 0.003 to 0.40 T/mK. The solution to this dilemma must be in the interpretation of the experiments, perhaps in the functional form used to represent the volume dependence of 0 or, as noted by Guyer,22 in the sensitivity of the Weiss temperatures deduced from susceptibility data to higher-order terms of the Hamiltonian.…”
Section: (T/h) 2 [P(tvh)-p(tv0)]mentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our experiment H/T varies from 0.03 to 0.28 T/mK and Prewitt and Goodkind have shown that the susceptibility is field independent for H/T from 0.003 to 0.40 T/mK. The solution to this dilemma must be in the interpretation of the experiments, perhaps in the functional form used to represent the volume dependence of 0 or, as noted by Guyer,22 in the sensitivity of the Weiss temperatures deduced from susceptibility data to higher-order terms of the Hamiltonian.…”
Section: (T/h) 2 [P(tvh)-p(tv0)]mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…2 which allows for higher-order magnetic terms and lattice terms yields the value -(2.91 ±0.04)(7/24) 20 ' 7±2 -°. This is the discrepancy noted by Guyer 22 and is evident even if only data above 100 mK are considered. The corresponding 9 is shown as the dashed band in Fig.…”
Section: (T/h) 2 [P(tvh)-p(tv0)]mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…(2.6), however, and no complete agreement can be expected unless we go outside the framework of a spin Hamiltonian [see the discussion below Eq. (2.2); see also Guyer, 1978]. Private communication with Adams indicated a possible error might be an undetermined additive constant in P, which could differ from one field to another.…”
Section: Pressure Versus Field Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The review by Guyer (1978) gives an idea of the theoretical situation at that time. The paper of McMahan and Wilkins (1975) was an attempt to calculate the magnitude of four-spin exchanges, perhaps in the older tradition.…”
Section: B Post-1975 Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2,3,4) The atom-atom exchange process is potentially so complex (two, three and even four particle exchange must be considered) and so sensitive to the molar volume that it seems likely that at densities well above those used in current experiments still further ordered structures might be found. (1) The two known spin-ordered phases of solid 3He are themselves unusual although not unique, and the mechanism leading to nuclear order is the direct exchange of atoms between nearby lattice sites.…”
Section: Bell Laboratories Mu"ay Hill New Jersey 07974mentioning
confidence: 99%