2019
DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2019.0851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review on voltage‐violation mitigation techniques of distribution networks with distributed rooftop PV systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(109 reference statements)
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the SPV penetration increases, the subjected distribution network may get vulnerable to significant voltage fluctuations. The reverse power flow due to excess solar power generation or operating at a unity power factor without considering the reactive power requirements may lead to a voltage rise in the distribution network [25,26,27,28]. The magnitude of the voltage rise is affected by the feeder configuration, the distance between the distribution feeder and the SPV source along the feeder path, the connections of fixed capacitors and the level of solar irradiation.…”
Section: Voltage Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the SPV penetration increases, the subjected distribution network may get vulnerable to significant voltage fluctuations. The reverse power flow due to excess solar power generation or operating at a unity power factor without considering the reactive power requirements may lead to a voltage rise in the distribution network [25,26,27,28]. The magnitude of the voltage rise is affected by the feeder configuration, the distance between the distribution feeder and the SPV source along the feeder path, the connections of fixed capacitors and the level of solar irradiation.…”
Section: Voltage Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hosting capacity is defined as the maximum PV generation that can be integrated into the network without violating standard limits for voltage, protection and power quality and with no feeder upgrades. In this context, several methodologies have been presented to increase DNs hosting capacities such as feeder reinforcement, PV active power curtailment and PV reactive power control [2]. However, the equipment upgrades, and PV power reduction are not cost‐effective for system operators and customers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), installed capacity of solar PV globally would rise six‐fold by 2030 (2840 GW) compared to installations in 2018 (480 GW) [2]. However, incorporation of dispersed PV units in a large scale in distribution networks would cause over‐voltage, under‐voltage, line congestions, and fluctuation of feeder power [3, 4]. Moreover, PV units possess dynamic characteristics concerning various scenarios, namely, installation location in the feeder, nature of the feeder, loading conditions etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, advanced control strategies are required to effectively regulate the voltage profile. The utilisation of reactive power capability of smart inverter interfaced PV units has been explored in [1, 3, 11]. Moreover, curtailment of PV power during the peak generation hours is one of the less encouraging options to mitigate voltage rise [5, 10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%