2024
DOI: 10.3390/f15040727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review on the Application of Nature-Based Solutions in Urban Forest Planning and Sustainable Management

Jiajia Zhao,
Clive Davies,
Charlotte Veal
et al.

Abstract: Despite growing recognition of nature-based solutions (NBS), there remains a research gap in understanding their implementation in urban areas, which poses a significant challenge for urban forest development. Therefore, our paper aims to explore the intersection of NBS with urban forests (UF), identify current barriers, propose strategies to maximize the potential of urban forests as nature-based solutions (UF-NBS) in effectively improving the resilience of urban forests, and enhance the service capacity of u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors of most other meta-analyses carried out on a wide range of topics set even stricter quality criteria and only include papers indexed in Web of Science and Scopus in the analysis. For example, [73][74][75][76] only use the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database. Other authors only use Scopus [77].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors of most other meta-analyses carried out on a wide range of topics set even stricter quality criteria and only include papers indexed in Web of Science and Scopus in the analysis. For example, [73][74][75][76] only use the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database. Other authors only use Scopus [77].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crossref publications are many times more numerous than publications indexed in Web of Science and Scopus, especially for the national literature. Therefore, the coverage of non-English publications, as well as books and conference materials in our research analysis, is significantly higher than if we had used Web of Science and Scopus, which are very popular for writing systematic reviews [73][74][75][76][77]. This makes our study more comprehensive than other studies based on automated searches.…”
Section: Selecting Studies To Include In a Systematic Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%