2020
DOI: 10.1080/19397038.2020.1866708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review on multi-criteria decision analysis in sustainable manufacturing decision making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
0
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies on SM with ML algorithms are covering areas in SM that include production planning, total energy consumption, job shop scheduling, product design and sustainable machining (Tayal et al, 2020). The inclusion of emerging technologies such as IoT, artificial intelligence, data analytics, digital delivery services is influencing SM practices in the Industry 4.0 era (Jamwal et al, 2021a;Machado et al, 2020). Some studies have reported that the use of these advanced technologies in sustainable manufacturing results in minimizing total energy consumptions, reduced labours inputs, and better condition-based maintenance prediction (Wu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies on SM with ML algorithms are covering areas in SM that include production planning, total energy consumption, job shop scheduling, product design and sustainable machining (Tayal et al, 2020). The inclusion of emerging technologies such as IoT, artificial intelligence, data analytics, digital delivery services is influencing SM practices in the Industry 4.0 era (Jamwal et al, 2021a;Machado et al, 2020). Some studies have reported that the use of these advanced technologies in sustainable manufacturing results in minimizing total energy consumptions, reduced labours inputs, and better condition-based maintenance prediction (Wu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MCDM techniques come in a variety of forms such as Analytic hierarchy process (Saaty, 1980), Analytic network process , Best worst method (Rezaei, 2015), Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (Hwang & Yoon, 1981), VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje(VIKOR) that means: Multicriteria Optimization and Compromise Solution (Opricovic & Tzeng, 2007), ELimination Et Choix Traduisant la REalité (ELECTR) ( Roy, 1968), Preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation (Brauers, 2003), Multi-Objective Optimization based on Ratio Analysis ( Zavadskas, 2007), etc. and these methods can be used in many different areas such as manufacturing industry (Nallusamy et al, 2016;Vigneshvaran & Vinodh, 2021;Jamwal et al, 2021), Logistics and Transport (Tzeng & Huang, 2012;Kumru & Kumru, 2014;Mardani et al, 2016), electronic industry(Aravind et al, 2014Asante et al, 2019), shipping industry (Seker et al, 2017;Gavalas et al, 2021), hydrology and water management(de Castro-Pardo et al, 2021;Dey et al, 2021), telecommunication industry (Lin et al, 2010;Hussain et al, 2019), energy management (Ecer, 2021;Kannan et al, 2021)…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [75], the authors point out that the AHP method offers advantages when compared to other classical decision-making methods, such as the possibility to decompose the decision problem hierarchically and use subjective and verbal expressions to determine the relative importance of the established criteria [76]. Furthermore, Jamwal et al 2021 identified as strengths of AHP: ease of being adapted to the objectives, suitable and flexible to support decision, can be applied in numerous areas and can measure consistency based on expert opinion and provide a simple and flexible model to analyze problems [77].…”
Section: Ahp-based Procedures For Selecting An Appropriate Eco-efficiency Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, AHP is a widely employed method due to its flexibility [78] and is considered a simple and flexible technique when it is necessary to analyze criteria quantitatively and qualitatively [77].…”
Section: Ahp-based Procedures For Selecting An Appropriate Eco-efficiency Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%