2014
DOI: 10.9790/3021-04362832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review on Fragmentation in Distributed Database Environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been 3 main fragmentation forms that are vertical, horizontal and hybrid / mixed fragmentation. Vertical fragments are attribute subsets while horizontal fragments are tuple subsets (Kaundal et. al, 2014).…”
Section: Fragmentation On Distributed Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…There have been 3 main fragmentation forms that are vertical, horizontal and hybrid / mixed fragmentation. Vertical fragments are attribute subsets while horizontal fragments are tuple subsets (Kaundal et. al, 2014).…”
Section: Fragmentation On Distributed Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been a recent trend away from centralized database systems for a number of reasons, researcher moves to distributed database due to some drawbacks of centralize database such as expensive communication costs, inaccessibility in situation of system breakdown and a lone source obstacle (Kaundal et. al, 2014 andVerma, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The work proposed in this paper tends to analyse the time required to extract the Generalise [3,4,6,7,8] the datasets achieved from different databases, scattered over different sites, whether Heterogeneous or Homogeneous databases. The analysis is done by comparing with extraction of ungeneralised datasets and Generalised datasets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%