Review on behavioral impacts of aquatic noise on crustaceans

Tidau, Svenja; Briffa, Mark

doi:10.1121/2.0000302

Cited by 21 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Available evidence to date comes from water fleas, Daphnia spp., which are widespread pelagic crustaceans (Cladocera) and an important source of food for upper trophic levels [24,25]. Surprisingly, knowing that marine invertebrates of similar size were found to adjust their swimming activity in response to natural or artificial sounds [26], water fleas exposed to band-pass filtered white noise either continuous or intermittent did not show any alteration in swimming speed or depth [27,28]. However, long-term effects of chronic exposure on their survival and reproductive success have yet to be explored, and overall, we lack knowledge on the dynamics of plankton under anthropogenic noise.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

From behaviour to complex communities: Resilience to anthropogenic noise in a fish-induced trophic cascade

Rojas

Gouret

Agostini

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARYSound emissions from human activities represent a pervasive environmental stressor. Individual responses in terms of behaviour, physiology or anatomy are well documented but whether they propagate through nested ecological interactions to alter complex communities needs to be better understood. This is even more relevant for freshwater ecosystems that harbour a disproportionate fraction of biodiversity but receive less attention than marine and terrestrial systems. We conducted a mesocosm investigation to study the effect of chronic exposure to motorboat noise on the dynamics of a freshwater community including phytoplankton, zooplankton, and roach as a planktivorous fish. As expected under the trophic cascade hypothesis, roach predation induced structural changes in the planktonic communities. Surprisingly, although roach changed their feeding behaviour in response to noise, the dynamics of the roach-dominated planktonic communities did not differ between noisy and noiseless mesocosms. This suggests that the top-down structuring influence of roach on planktonic communities might be resilient to noise and reveals the difficulties on extrapolating impacts form individual responses to complex communities.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

From behaviour to complex communities: Resilience to anthropogenic noise in a fish-induced trophic cascade

Rojas

Gouret

Agostini

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Kight and Swaddle [57]; Dufour [58]). However, most of reviews are • concerning taxonomic groups (population): some reviews deal with specific taxa-such as fishes [59], marine mammals [60] or crustaceans [61]-or with wider groups-such as invertebrates [31] [67] (which is also a proceeding) deal with behavioural impacts.…”

Section: Reviews and Meta-analysesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evidence of the impact of noise pollution on biodiversity: a systematic map

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Ecological research now deals increasingly with the effects of noise pollution on biodiversity. Indeed, many studies have shown the impacts of anthropogenic noise and concluded that it is potentially a threat to the persistence of many species. The present work is a systematic map of the evidence of the impacts of all anthropogenic noises (industrial, urban, transportation, etc.) on biodiversity. This report describes the mapping process and the evidence base with summary figures and tables presenting the characteristics of the selected articles. Methods The method used was published in an a priori protocol. Searches included peer-reviewed and grey literature published in English and French. Two online databases were searched using English terms and search consistency was assessed with a test list. Supplementary searches were also performed (using search engines, a call for literature and searching relevant reviews). Articles were screened through three stages (titles, abstracts, full-texts). No geographical restrictions were applied. The subject population included all wild species (plants and animals excluding humans) and ecosystems. Exposures comprised all types of man-made sounds in terrestrial and aquatic media, including all contexts and sound origins (spontaneous or recorded sounds, in situ or laboratory studies, etc.). All relevant outcomes were considered (space use, reproduction, communication, etc.). Then, for each article selected after full-text screening, metadata were extracted on key variables of interest (species, types of sound, outcomes, etc.). Review findings Our main result is a database that includes all retrieved literature on the impacts of anthropogenic noise on species and ecosystems, coded with several markers (sources of noise, species concerned, types of impacts, etc.). Our search produced more than 29,000 articles and 1794 were selected after the three screening stages (1340 studies (i.e. primary research), 379 reviews, 16 meta-analyses). Some articles (n = 19) are written in French and all others are in English. This database is available as an additional file of this report. It provides an overview of the current state of knowledge. It can be used for primary research by identifying knowledge gaps or in view of further analysis, such as systematic reviews. It can also be helpful for scientists and researchers as well as for practitioners, such as managers of transportation infrastructure. Conclusion The systematic map reveals that the impacts of anthropogenic noises on species and ecosystems have been researched for many years. In particular, some taxonomic groups (mammals, birds, fishes), types of noise (transportation, industrial, abstract) and outcomes (behavioural, biophysiological, communication) have been studied more than others. Conversely, less knowledge is available on certain species (amphibians, reptiles, invertebrates), noises (recreational, military, urban) and impacts (space use, reproduction, ecosystems). The map does not assess the impacts of anthropogenic noise, but it can be the starting point for more thorough synthesis of evidence. After a critical appraisal, the included reviews and meta-analyses could be exploited, if reliable, to transfer the already synthesized knowledge into operational decisions to reduce noise pollution and protect biodiversity.

show abstract

“…In recent years, marine low-frequency noise has received attention from researchers, but most studies have focused on vertebrates such as fish and marine mammals, and few have focused on invertebrates ( de Soto, 2016). Invertebrates are abundant and widespread in marine ecosystems, and thus, they are often used as good bioindicators of the effects of environmental change and more sensitive to low-frequency sounds than vertebrates (Tidau and Briffa, 2016). Therefore, it is particularly important to evaluate the impacts of low-frequency noise on these organisms and the ecosystems in which they live.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Transcriptome Analysis of the Central Nervous System of Sea Slug (Onchidium reevesii) Exposed to Low-Frequency Noise

Tang

Zhang

et al. 2021

Front. Mar. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Low-frequency noise has become a marine pollutant that cannot be ignored, but most studies have focused on the behavioral and physiological effects on marine vertebrates, with few studies in marine mollusks. Therefore, sea slug was used in this study to investigate the effect of low-frequency noise on its physiological aspects. This experiment was designed with different low-frequency noise (0, 100, 300, and 500 Hz) and different stimulation times (0, 6, and 12 h) to measure superoxide dismutase (SOD), malondialdehyde (MDA), and catalase (CAT) activities in hemolymph and transcriptomics in the control (C) and 6 and 12 h groups (L1 and L2) with 500 Hz noise. The results showed a positive correlation between antioxidant enzyme activity and low-frequency noise frequency (P < 0.05) and no correlation with time (P > 0.05). In central nervous system (CNS) transcriptomics, 2,460 and 3,268 genes had upregulated expression and 2,765 and 2,783 genes had downregulated expression in the L1 and L2 groups, respectively, compared to the C group. According to Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis, low-frequency noise mainly affects signaling pathways such as cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, the FoxO signaling pathway, natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity, apoptosis immune-related pathways, and energy metabolic pathways such as glycolysis, the TCA cycle, and glycerophospholipid metabolism, as well as neurological pathways such as GABAergic synapses, the synaptic vesicle cycle, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and other neurological pathways. This study would provide valuable reference information on the potential response of mollusks to low-frequency noise stress.

show abstract

Review on behavioral impacts of aquatic noise on crustaceans

Cited by 21 publications

References 27 publications

From behaviour to complex communities: Resilience to anthropogenic noise in a fish-induced trophic cascade

From behaviour to complex communities: Resilience to anthropogenic noise in a fish-induced trophic cascade

Evidence of the impact of noise pollution on biodiversity: a systematic map

Transcriptome Analysis of the Central Nervous System of Sea Slug (Onchidium reevesii) Exposed to Low-Frequency Noise

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About