2020
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-2019-270-rc3
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Zwinger et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
67
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study shows that women younger and older than the age range of this study has a bigger risk for having unintended pregnancy than women aging 20-35 years. This is in-line with previous study which stated that the older the women, the higher their chance of having unintended pregnancy [10,11]. Pregnancy in younger age (<20 years old) or older age (>35 years old) has a high risk on maternal and child health [12].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study shows that women younger and older than the age range of this study has a bigger risk for having unintended pregnancy than women aging 20-35 years. This is in-line with previous study which stated that the older the women, the higher their chance of having unintended pregnancy [10,11]. Pregnancy in younger age (<20 years old) or older age (>35 years old) has a high risk on maternal and child health [12].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This study states that women who are illiterate about KB method have lower risk of having unintended pregnancy rather than literate women. It was not in-line with the previous study which stated the literate women have lower risk of having unintended pregnancy than women who are illiterate about KB method [11]. The lack of knowledge in service providers and acceptors of KB indicates the lack of basic information about all of the KB methods, this misinformation could cause low usage of KB and affect the unintended pregnancy [12].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…As is well-known, the DAMA/Libra experiment [20] observes a yearly modulation in scattering events with a peak date in June [21]. This signal is also compatible with the initial modulation analysis of the COSINE-100 experiment [22], though the results have nearly equal preference for the null (i.e., no dark matter signal) hypothesis. Assuming the SHM or a smooth halo profile derived from simulation, it is difficult to interpret the DAMA/Libra signal as dark matter, given the negative results from other experiments, for both spin-independent (SI) and spin-dependent (SD) interactions [23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…After the submission of the present paper COSINE-100 has released its first annual modulation analysis, consistent at 68.3% C.L. with both a null hypothesis and DAMA/LIBRA's 2-6 keVee best-fit value [65].…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 73%