2001
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2001.00187.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of validation studies of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale

Abstract: Citation Index Expanded (ISI) from the period 1987-2000. For sensitivity and specificity of the EPDS presented in each study, 95% confidence intervals were estimated. Positive and negative predictive values were estimated assuming prevalences of postpartum depression ranging from 5% to 20%. Results: Eighteen validation studies were identified. The study design varied between studies. The sensitivity and specificity estimates also varied: 65-100% and 49-100%, respectively. The confidence intervals were estimate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
104
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(76 reference statements)
2
104
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study of the Persian version of EPDS suggested that the best cutoff scores for major depression and combined depression were 12=13 and 11=12, respectively (Table 1). In studies by Cox et al (1987), Boyce et al (1993), Lee et al (1998), and others (Eberhard-Gran et al 2001), the same cutoff score (i.e., 12=13) has been recommended. It must be mentioned that in this cutoff, 4.7% of the cases remained undiagnosed and 12.1% were falsely labeled as major depressives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study of the Persian version of EPDS suggested that the best cutoff scores for major depression and combined depression were 12=13 and 11=12, respectively (Table 1). In studies by Cox et al (1987), Boyce et al (1993), Lee et al (1998), and others (Eberhard-Gran et al 2001), the same cutoff score (i.e., 12=13) has been recommended. It must be mentioned that in this cutoff, 4.7% of the cases remained undiagnosed and 12.1% were falsely labeled as major depressives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that rates of depressive disorder in primary care settings have been reported as being 4 . 8 % to 9.2%, 5 it seems that rates of depression in pregnancy are higher than rates in the non-pregnant female population, whilst rates of postpartum depression approximate the general average in women of reproductive age. 6 In relation to the former, significant specific predictors for antenatal depression are an unwanted or unplanned pregnancy, low social support, low income and history of childhood sexual abuse (CSA).…”
Section: Pregnancy As a Risk Factor For Relapsementioning
confidence: 89%
“…EPDS brukes ikke til å diagnostisere fødselsdepresjon, men gjennom opplaering og trening kan den enkelte helsearbeider oppdage, støtte og eventuelt viderehenvise kvinner med risiko for å utvikle fødselsdepresjon. (2,3,12,19,20).…”
Section: Epdsunclassified