2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.04.085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of tri-generation technologies: Design evaluation, optimization, decision-making, and selection approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 261 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is based on findings from different sources as well as on the authors' judgement. Up to 2 MW [25] Up to 150 kW [2] up to 2 MW [2] Up to 1,000 kW [21] Advantages Very high reliability (with clean fuels) [21,45] Rapid start-up [21] Low investment costs [21] Excellent partial load performance [25] Very high electric efficiency [5,21] Low noise [45] Low emissions [5,21] Can use low quality fuels due to external combustion [21,25,32] Good partial load performance [12,25,32] Potentially low maintenance requirements/ less moving parts [21,46] High thermal efficiency [5] Low emissions [5,32] Can run with low grade heat [12] High reliability [12,47] Low maintenance costs [5,48] Good partial load behaviour [47] Low quality fuels can be used for externally driven units [21] Very few moving parts [21] Very compact sizes [21] High temperature exhaust [45] Low emissions [45] Disadvantages Short maintenance intervals [21,45] Instability with bioand syngas/ limited fuel flexibility [21,48,49] High noise [45] High NOxemissions…”
Section: Prime Movermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is based on findings from different sources as well as on the authors' judgement. Up to 2 MW [25] Up to 150 kW [2] up to 2 MW [2] Up to 1,000 kW [21] Advantages Very high reliability (with clean fuels) [21,45] Rapid start-up [21] Low investment costs [21] Excellent partial load performance [25] Very high electric efficiency [5,21] Low noise [45] Low emissions [5,21] Can use low quality fuels due to external combustion [21,25,32] Good partial load performance [12,25,32] Potentially low maintenance requirements/ less moving parts [21,46] High thermal efficiency [5] Low emissions [5,32] Can run with low grade heat [12] High reliability [12,47] Low maintenance costs [5,48] Good partial load behaviour [47] Low quality fuels can be used for externally driven units [21] Very few moving parts [21] Very compact sizes [21] High temperature exhaust [45] Low emissions [45] Disadvantages Short maintenance intervals [21,45] Instability with bioand syngas/ limited fuel flexibility [21,48,49] High noise [45] High NOxemissions…”
Section: Prime Movermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With no moving parts and no combustion, fuel cells (FCs) are a completely different type of prime mover from their mechanical counterparts, excelling in environmental impact and load flexibility [45]. However, the environmental benefit is rapidly equalized when considering the energy consumption and GHG emissions for producing hydrogen or methane as fuel.…”
Section: Fuel Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trigeneration system (CCHP) may have a complex structure which depends on available technologies of prime mover. According to the prime mover the following technologies can be identified [1]: steam turbines, gas turbines, microturbines, combined cycle gas turbines, reciprocating internal combustion engines (RICE) and new emerging technologies such as organic rankine cycle, Stirling engines, fuel cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the design is feasible, initiate step 14. Otherwise, repeat steps 7-12 with revised value of ΔT min , revised set of pinch rules and constraints [11].…”
Section: • Stream Target Temperature -T T °C • Heat Capacity Flowratementioning
confidence: 99%