2006
DOI: 10.1201/9781420006391.ch1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Three-Dimensional Ecological Modelling Related to the North Sea Shelf System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model results from 2006 indicate good or very good (Radach and Moll 2006) cost function values for most variables in the different areas. The best results are seen for the summer CHL, which are found to be very good in almost all models and areas, while the lower layer O 2 concentrations have the highest number of poor results (Table 3).…”
Section: Comparison To In Situ Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model results from 2006 indicate good or very good (Radach and Moll 2006) cost function values for most variables in the different areas. The best results are seen for the summer CHL, which are found to be very good in almost all models and areas, while the lower layer O 2 concentrations have the highest number of poor results (Table 3).…”
Section: Comparison To In Situ Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost function is computed as: In Radach and Moll (2006), the following criteria for performance are used: C \ 1 = very good, 1 \ C \ 2 = good, 2 \ C \ 3 = reasonable, and C [ 3 = poor. One may note that the value of C i becomes large if the modeled mean value differs much from the mean value of the in situ data.…”
Section: The In Situ Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 'goodness-of-fit' between these model results and associated field measurements was calculated using the 'cost function' (OSPAR, 1998;Radach & Moll, 2006). The cost function is a mathematical function that gives a non-dimensional number, which is indicative of the 'goodness of fit' between two sets of data, in this case, model results and observations.…”
Section: Applicability Of the 'Gem' Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validation results were classified according to the following rating criteria (Radach & Moll, 2006) …”
Section: Applicability Of the 'Gem' Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation