2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11883-009-0048-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of the SPARCL trial and its subanalyses

Abstract: The Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) study is a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial that was designed to determine whether 80 mg/d of atorvastatin reduced the risk of fatal or nonfatal stroke in patients who had previously experienced a stroke or transient ischemic attack. It is unique in that it is the only trial to study this cohort of patients with no known coronary heart disease. The review recaps the results of the primary SPARCL data and discusses the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This randomized trial of 4731 patients showed that 80 mg of atorvastatin per day significantly reduced the combined absolute incidence of fatal and non‐fatal stroke (3·5% at 5 years) and cardiovascular events, with a minimal increase in the incidence of haemorrhagic stroke 7 . Nevertheless, this study was subjected to numerous qualifications and potential limitations, a circumstance that prompted the conduct of other clinical trials with stroke patient subgroups 8–10 …”
Section: What Is Known and Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This randomized trial of 4731 patients showed that 80 mg of atorvastatin per day significantly reduced the combined absolute incidence of fatal and non‐fatal stroke (3·5% at 5 years) and cardiovascular events, with a minimal increase in the incidence of haemorrhagic stroke 7 . Nevertheless, this study was subjected to numerous qualifications and potential limitations, a circumstance that prompted the conduct of other clinical trials with stroke patient subgroups 8–10 …”
Section: What Is Known and Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Nevertheless, this study was subjected to numerous qualifications and potential limitations, a circumstance that prompted the conduct of other clinical trials with stroke patient subgroups. [8][9][10] It is fully established that the use of statins (drugs inhibiting 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A; HMG-CoA) is an important element in stroke prevention, not only because they reduce stroke recurrence but because they also reduce potential atherosclerotic vascular diseases, 8,11,12 a finding backed by numerous national and international scientific societies. 13,14 Correspondence: Dr A. Sicras-Mainar, Directorate of Planning, Badalona Serveis Assistencials SA, Gaietá Soler, 6-8 entresuelo, 08911 Badalona, Barcelona, Spain.…”
Section: What Is Known and Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The association between statin treatment and intracerebral hemorrhage, especially after publication of the results of the SPARCL study [Goldstein et al, 2008;Goldstein et al, 2009;Welch, 2009], raises the very genuine issue of the adverse event after tPA treatment. Uyttenboogaart et al [2008] analyzed the data of 252 patients treated with tPA.…”
Section: Satin In Tissue Plasminogen Activator (Tpa) Ischemic Stroke mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the SPARCL trial, the size of the reduction in stroke risk was greater in patients who had carotid stenosis, in those who had an atherothrombotic stroke at entry or diabetes, and in patients who were younger than 65 years. The treatment effect did not significantly differ among any of these subgroups [13][14][15][16][17]. A recent analysis of this trial suggested that the outcome of recurrent ischaemic cerebrovascular events might be improved among statin users as compared with nonusers [18].…”
Section: Secondary Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%