2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-287-582-2_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of the Relationships Between Resilience and Positive Youth Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Istraživanja u prevencijskoj znanosti koja se fokusiraju na pronalaženje povezanosti između karakteristika pojedinca i/ili okruženja i ponašanja mladih najčešće se teorijski oslanjaju na koncept rizičnih i zaštitnih čimbenika, koncept otpornosti te koncept pozitivnog razvoja mladih. O povezanosti ovih koncepata govore mnogi autori (Barnová i Tamášová, 2018;Buchanan, 2014;Cheung, Lee,…”
Section: Uvodunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Istraživanja u prevencijskoj znanosti koja se fokusiraju na pronalaženje povezanosti između karakteristika pojedinca i/ili okruženja i ponašanja mladih najčešće se teorijski oslanjaju na koncept rizičnih i zaštitnih čimbenika, koncept otpornosti te koncept pozitivnog razvoja mladih. O povezanosti ovih koncepata govore mnogi autori (Barnová i Tamášová, 2018;Buchanan, 2014;Cheung, Lee,…”
Section: Uvodunclassified
“…Research in prevention science on relationships between an individual's characteristics and/or environment and youth behaviour is most often theoretically based on the concept of risk and protective factors, as well as the concept of resilience and positive youth development. Many studies have discussed the connections between these concepts (Barnová and Tamášová, 2018;Buchanan, 2014;Cheung, Lee, Kwong and Busiol, 2015;Forrest-Kwong i Busiol, 2015;Forrest-Bank, Nicotera, Anthony i Jenson, 2015;Lerner i sur., 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although empirical work on PYD in non-U.S. contexts has increased in the past few years and the evidence helps "extend the generalizability of the PYD framework beyond the U.S. context," Wiium and Dimitrova (2019) yet commented that "more research is needed to ascertain the appropriate developmental assets to facilitate PYD, as defined by the specific context where young people are embedded" (p. 147). In fact, most of the recent Chinese studies have focused on conceptual issues (Chen et al, 2017;Cheung et al, 2015), scale development (Chai et al, 2020;Chen et al, 2018), and relationships between PYD qualities and other developmental outcome indicators (Ding et al, 2017;Su et al, 2017;Zhou et al, 2020). In contrast, validated PYD programs and rigorous evaluation studies are very few in different Chinese societies.…”
Section: Pyd Programs and Evaluation Studies In Chinese Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%