2023
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-5288-3_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of the Fingerprint Liveness Detection (LivDet) Competition Series: From 2009 to 2021

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed experimental analysis was performed on LivDet 2019 and 2021 datasets [29]. Both datasets contain high-resolution fingerprint images, including live and spoof samples.…”
Section: Datasets and Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed experimental analysis was performed on LivDet 2019 and 2021 datasets [29]. Both datasets contain high-resolution fingerprint images, including live and spoof samples.…”
Section: Datasets and Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, artificial replicas known as Presentation Attack Instruments (PAIs) are utilized to deceive fingerprint capturing devices by mimicking fingerprint characteristics. These replicas can be crafted from a variety of materials such as gelatin, silicone, Body Double, different types of glue, or latex [37][38][39][40]. When targeting contact-based fingerprint capturing devices, it is essential that the PAI replicates the elasticity of real skin.…”
Section: Physical Fingerprint Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the PAI must meet criteria for persistence, allowing it to be used multiple times while also being easy to assemble and cost-effective. Silicone and Body Double, in particular, are well suited to fulfill these requirements [40].…”
Section: Physical Fingerprint Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PAIs can be made from a range of materials and can be either artificial or synthetic fingerprint samples. To address the security concerns caused by these attacks, several automated presentation attack detection (PAD) techniques have been developed in recent years [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ]. PAD systems are used to determine whether a specimen is from a genuine subject or an artificial copy (PA or artifact).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%