2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10712-009-9079-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of the Different Sources of Uncertainty in Single Polarization Radar-Based Estimates of Rainfall

Abstract: It is well acknowledged that there are large uncertainties associated with radarbased estimates of rainfall. Numerous sources of these errors are due to parameter estimation, the observational system and measurement principles, and not fully understood physical processes. Propagation of these uncertainties through all models for which radarrainfall are used as input (e.g., hydrologic models) or as initial conditions (e.g., weather forecasting models) is necessary to enhance the understanding and interpretation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
226
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 382 publications
(268 citation statements)
references
References 255 publications
3
226
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This is mainly due to the indirect nature of radar measurements, the non-agreement of radar and rain gauge sampling location and volumes as well as radar error sources such as path attenuation, ground clutter, beam blockage, anomalous beam propagation, bright band effects and unknown radar Z-R relationships (e.g. Sauvageot, 1992;Villarini and Krajewski, 2010). To overcome this limitation, research has focused on the conceptual description and correction of radar errors (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is mainly due to the indirect nature of radar measurements, the non-agreement of radar and rain gauge sampling location and volumes as well as radar error sources such as path attenuation, ground clutter, beam blockage, anomalous beam propagation, bright band effects and unknown radar Z-R relationships (e.g. Sauvageot, 1992;Villarini and Krajewski, 2010). To overcome this limitation, research has focused on the conceptual description and correction of radar errors (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radar data have been quality-controlled by the UKMO (Harrison et al 2000) to account for errors inherent in radar rainfall measurements (see e.g. RicoRamirez et al 2007, Villarini andKrajewski 2010). Radar data over the catchment are a composite of Hameldon Hill and Ingham radar stations (UK Met Office 2010), located 30 and 90 km from the catchment, respectively (Fig.…”
Section: Description Of Case Study and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…review by Villarini and Krajewski, 2010). These errors are recognised thanks to intensive empirical work performed at the national level (by national meteorological services) and at the international level, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%