2021
DOI: 10.3390/geosciences11020072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Soil-Structure Interaction Based on Continuum Mechanics Theory and Use of High Performance Computing

Abstract: Recent achievement of research on soil-structure interaction (SSI) is reviewed, with a main focus on the numerical analysis. The review is based on the continuum mechanics theory and the use of high-performance computing (HPC) and clarifies the characteristics of a wide range of treatment of SSI from a simplified model to a high fidelity model. Emphasized is that all the treatment can be regarded as the result of the mathematical approximations in solving a physical continuum mechanics problem of a soil-struct… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The soil deformability consequence is assessed employing a "discrete" system of "spring-dashpot-mass" [51] elements, with calculated values specified by Mulliken and Karabalis [51] using the relative calculation formulations providing the required mass, stiffness, and damping coefficients, as shown in Table 2 for reading convenience. In the worldwide literature [25][26][27][28][29], more complicated SSI models can be found, which may need time-consuming and complicated calculations and emphasize soil dynamic behavior. Here, attention is drawn to the nonlinear seismic response of the mixed model perspective with the impact of soil deformability in comparison to the rigid soil assumption.…”
Section: Description Of Case Models and Nlth Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The soil deformability consequence is assessed employing a "discrete" system of "spring-dashpot-mass" [51] elements, with calculated values specified by Mulliken and Karabalis [51] using the relative calculation formulations providing the required mass, stiffness, and damping coefficients, as shown in Table 2 for reading convenience. In the worldwide literature [25][26][27][28][29], more complicated SSI models can be found, which may need time-consuming and complicated calculations and emphasize soil dynamic behavior. Here, attention is drawn to the nonlinear seismic response of the mixed model perspective with the impact of soil deformability in comparison to the rigid soil assumption.…”
Section: Description Of Case Models and Nlth Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic "Soil-Structure Interaction (SSI)" [3] is widely identified to be critical in the response of special structures such as bridges [21,22], silos [23], and base-isolated structures [24] and, correspondingly, necessary to consider in their design [3]. Even more complex SSI models are accessible in research works, e.g., [25][26][27], that focus mainly on soil behavior [28,29]; however, they are not discussed here as they are not relevant to the aim of this work. Moreover, research works on usual structures have highlighted a significant impact of the deformability of the ground on the response of usual r/c constructions, as exemplified by [30][31][32][33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, 46 models were run for the 11 events. The parameters used for the analysis were: the average absolute error, calculated using Equation (10); the relative error of the maximum acceleration calculated by Equation (11); the relative error of the number of crossover distortions, given by Equation ( 12); the relative error of the number of crossover distortions for the strongest signal of the recording, given by Equation ( 13); the relative error of the duration of the strongest signal, calculated through Equation ( 14); and the relative error of the dominant frequency, given by Equation (15). The definitions of the parameters and the formulas are listed below.…”
Section: Comparisons Using Statistical Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuum models, based on the employment of brick or shell elements (for 3D and 2D analyses, respectively) to represent the soil behavior and the soil-structure interaction, are commonly referred to as the most exact and accurate for the prediction of the response of the complete soil-foundation-structure system. This kind of modeling technique is timeconsuming due to many degrees of freedom considered to represent the entire system, and therefore, its application has been focused on very large and stiff structures, like nuclear power plants, mostly for academic purposes [8][9][10]. However, the fast increase in the processing capabilities of computers is expected to make this methodology suitable for design purposes in the mid-term.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation