2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-75464-8_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Size Estimation Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Key population surveys rely on respondent-driven or network sampling methods 4,5 because KPs are hard to reach in household survey sampling frames due to small population size, high mobility and transient living arrangements, non-disclosure of risk behaviour, and societal marginalisation. [6][7][8] Surveys are commonly restricted to or disproportionately conducted in urban areas and studies are conducted infrequently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Key population surveys rely on respondent-driven or network sampling methods 4,5 because KPs are hard to reach in household survey sampling frames due to small population size, high mobility and transient living arrangements, non-disclosure of risk behaviour, and societal marginalisation. [6][7][8] Surveys are commonly restricted to or disproportionately conducted in urban areas and studies are conducted infrequently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key population surveys often rely on respondent-driven and venue-based sampling methods 5,6 whose interpretation as population-representative relies upon strong assumptions that can be difficult to meet in practice. Household survey sampling frames are inappropriate for surveying migratory populations that are unlikely to disclose risk behaviour due to societal marginalisation and discrimination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sample providing an estimate of B is referred to as the “benchmark” sample with the marginal count known; 1/ p is referred to as the “multiplier.” Several assumptions differentiate this method from capture–recapture: (1) p is the probability of observing a target subject, conditional on the specific characteristics ( B ); (2) the method requires completeness of the benchmark sample with respect to the characteristics ( B ) 8 ; and (3) the method can be applied when only two data sources are available; although it does require that data sets overlap or be related predictably, the individual linkage is not required for estimation. 8 For example, a benchmark population can be counted from a registry, such as substance use treatment program enrollment. The multiplier can be estimated from a separate survey by asking the participants about their treatment history.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%