2015
DOI: 10.12912/23920629/1989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Selected Biological Methods of Assessing the Quality of Natural Environment

Abstract: Efektem działalności człowieka są między innymi trafiające do środowiska ksenobiotyki. Szczególnie zanieczyszczenie gleb prowadzi do ich degradacji, co ostatecznie może wiązać się z zachwianiem równowagi biologicznej danego ekosystemu. Standardowo do oceny stanu środowiska glebowego wykorzystuje się chemiczne metody, które nie zawsze są szybkie i tanie. W związku z tym, praktyka oraz nauka przy monitoringu środowiska coraz częściej sięga po metody biologiczne, które w większości spełniają takie warunki, stając… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Seed plants are used mainly in soil ecotoxicological studies. Commonly used organisms include rice, oats, wheat, ryegrass, rapeseed, lettuce, red clover, and watercress [37,38]. Invertebrates are also used in ecotoxicological studies.…”
Section: Biological Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seed plants are used mainly in soil ecotoxicological studies. Commonly used organisms include rice, oats, wheat, ryegrass, rapeseed, lettuce, red clover, and watercress [37,38]. Invertebrates are also used in ecotoxicological studies.…”
Section: Biological Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Toxicological studies in which morphological changes of bioindicators are observed in contact with xenobiotics and their metabolites provide an objective assessment on the degree of threat the contaminated soils may be subjected to. Bioassays usually use bacteria, invertebrates and embryophyta as the main groups of organisms (Mankiewicz-Boczek et al, 2008;Baran and Tarnawski, 2013;Baudo et al, 2015;Jakubus and Tatuśko, 2015). For fast, repeatable and reliable bacterial tests, the microbiological risk assessment test MARA should be employed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%