2013
DOI: 10.1080/10934529.2011.627030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Screening Systems for Prioritizing Chemical Substances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Large number of organic chemicals have been produced and released into the environment worldwide and the number is increasing (Bu et al, 2013). Adverse ecological and human health effects have been observed for these organic contaminants (OCs) (Long et al, 1995;Sharpe, 2001;Feron et al, 2002;Sharpe and Irvine, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large number of organic chemicals have been produced and released into the environment worldwide and the number is increasing (Bu et al, 2013). Adverse ecological and human health effects have been observed for these organic contaminants (OCs) (Long et al, 1995;Sharpe, 2001;Feron et al, 2002;Sharpe and Irvine, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, some type of prioritization or ranking is required in order to allocate monitoring efforts towards relevant target compounds (Ela et al 2011;GuillĂ©n et al 2012). A number of prioritization methods have been proposed for and applied to rank different organic compounds (Arnot and Mackay 2008;Muñoz et al 2008;Kumar and Xagoraraki 2010;Murray et al 2010;Daginnus et al 2011), and a detailed review was provided by Bu et al (2013).…”
Section: Prioritization Of Chemicalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These lists in China were mainly based on the existing priority lists in USA and Europe. These ranking approaches should be further developed for different situations covering different geographical regions, climates, demographics, and cultural backgrounds and should be designed in such a way that they account for the use practices, complex fate processes, and the specific modes of action associated with many chemicals (Boxall et al 2013;Bu et al 2013). …”
Section: Prioritization Of Chemicalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, water managers have expressed uncertainty as to whether some remaining unregulated contaminants should be included in the regulations. The approaches applied to identify and prioritize unregulated contaminants were summarized in our previous review [9]. As an example, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) publishes a Contaminant Candidate List (CCL) every five years under the authorization of the Safe Drinking Water Act [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%