2015
DOI: 10.1111/2041-210x.12393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of rope‐based access methods for the forest canopy: safe and unsafe practices in published information sources and a summary of current methods

Abstract: Summary1. The availability of reliable information on tree climbing methods is critical for the development of canopy science and for the safety of workers accessing the forest canopy. 2. To assess the breadth and quality of information contained in published climbing information, we performed searches in Web of Science and Google Scholar and evaluated 54 published sources on 10 predetermined criteria related to safety. 3. We found a high incidence of unsafe recommendations that, if followed, could result in s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a subset of the individuals ( n = 61), we measured the height of leaf sampling. Small branches of canopy plants were collected using the French‐spike tree climbing method (Fonderies Lacoste, Excideuil, France; de Castilho, Magnusson, Oliveira de Araújo, Da Costa Pereira, & De Souza ) or the single‐rope technique (Anderson, Koomjian, French, Altenhoff, & Luce, ). When part of the foliage of an individual was exposed to direct sunlight, sun leaves were collected when possible, otherwise shade leaves were collected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a subset of the individuals ( n = 61), we measured the height of leaf sampling. Small branches of canopy plants were collected using the French‐spike tree climbing method (Fonderies Lacoste, Excideuil, France; de Castilho, Magnusson, Oliveira de Araújo, Da Costa Pereira, & De Souza ) or the single‐rope technique (Anderson, Koomjian, French, Altenhoff, & Luce, ). When part of the foliage of an individual was exposed to direct sunlight, sun leaves were collected when possible, otherwise shade leaves were collected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A single arborist (M. Cashmore, Treetec Arboriculture and Ecology) cut all the bat chainsaw hollows using a systematic procedure to ensure consistency in the dimensions of the entrance slit and internal cavity. The selection of candidate trees, and the locations within trees where chainsaw hollows were cut, were determined using the International Society of Arboriculture Tree Risk Assessment Method [77], which incorporates empirical assessment of a range of factors that may influence the risk that any particular tree poses to the public (i.e., recording a range of data to assess the overall health and structural integrity of a tree), the risk and potential consequences that any work action taken may pose (e.g., pruning or not pruning a specific limb), plus the risks that the tree poses to anyone working within it (e.g., an arborist using the single rope climbing technique to access the canopy [78]). Using the strength loss formula from Smiley and Fraedrich [75], we calculated that the minimum stem diameter that could safely incorporate a bat chainsaw hollow was 10 cm.…”
Section: Bat Cavitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total five elevated nets of 6 x 3 meters were placed at the AHF, while three nets of 6 x 3 meters and two nets of 12 x 3 meters were used in the understory. Two trees in each station were climbed using the single rope technique (Anderson et al 2015) to install the elevated nets at AHF. The ground nets were located just beneath the elevated ones in the understory zone.…”
Section: Bat Capturementioning
confidence: 99%