2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11516-020-0002-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Research on Learning and Instruction with Specific Reference to Reading Chinese as an Additional Language (1976–2018)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, in CSL teaching, learners are commonly taught to learn single characters by rote. Previous research has suggested explicit instructions on orthographic knowledge are necessary for reading CSL (e.g., Nguyen et al, 2017 ; Gong et al, 2018 ; Ke, 2020 ). In light of our findings, teachers are recommended to help students better grasp the written form of words, rather than simply memorizing more characters.…”
Section: Limitations and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, in CSL teaching, learners are commonly taught to learn single characters by rote. Previous research has suggested explicit instructions on orthographic knowledge are necessary for reading CSL (e.g., Nguyen et al, 2017 ; Gong et al, 2018 ; Ke, 2020 ). In light of our findings, teachers are recommended to help students better grasp the written form of words, rather than simply memorizing more characters.…”
Section: Limitations and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past decade, Chinese language teaching and learning as a FL or L2 has attracted more and more attention in and outside China (Gong et al, 2020b(Gong et al, , 2021Ke, 2020). However, there still exists a disparity between the development of L2/FL Chinese and L2 English strategy use research (Jiang and Cohen, 2012;Ma et al, 2017).…”
Section: Strategy Use and L2 Chinese Reading Comprehensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most research in mainland Chinese journals still describes L2 learners' strategy use in Chinese reading through classroom observation and explains well-recognized strategy taxonomies (Jiang and Cohen, 2012). Moreover, most empirical studies have examined strategy use in lower-level reading processes, such as character recognition and word segmentation (Shen, 2004(Shen, , 2005Ke, 2020), rather than higher-level processes involving inferential comprehension.…”
Section: Strategy Use and L2 Chinese Reading Comprehensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our search of the literature (as detailed in the section ‘Literature search’) identified 10 existing papers, published in English, providing reviews of CFL research. However, six of them review a specific topic of research within CFL (Hughes et al, 2019; Ke, 2020; Li & Li, 2020; Lyu & Qi, 2020; Zhao, 2011; Zhou, 2020); one reviews just two books (Mai, 2016); and the remaining three papers are general reviews but are based on (a) publications predominantly or solely in Chinese using China‐based journals and (b) literature published in a relatively short period of time, ranging from 4 years to 13 (Gong et al, 2020; Gong, Hu, & Lai, 2018; Gong et al, 2018; Ma et al, 2017). In other words, we were unable to identify any systematic review or meta‐analysis of the overall trend of CFL research based on publications written in English that would address an international readership.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%