2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10337-018-3677-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Recommendations for Bioanalytical Method Validation: Chromatographic Assays and Ligand Binding Assays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, a glaring trend is that ligand binding assays are being increasingly replaced by LC-MS/MS (Shaaban & G orecki, 2015). For the study of substances in intricate biological matrices, LC-MS/MS offers outstanding selectivity, good accuracy and precision, and a wide dynamic range (Londhe & Rajadhyaksha, 2019;Pailleux & Beaudry, 2012). However, to date, no report has been published on simultaneous bioanalytical measurement of [ 19 F]-alfatide and alfatide using LC-MS/ MS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, a glaring trend is that ligand binding assays are being increasingly replaced by LC-MS/MS (Shaaban & G orecki, 2015). For the study of substances in intricate biological matrices, LC-MS/MS offers outstanding selectivity, good accuracy and precision, and a wide dynamic range (Londhe & Rajadhyaksha, 2019;Pailleux & Beaudry, 2012). However, to date, no report has been published on simultaneous bioanalytical measurement of [ 19 F]-alfatide and alfatide using LC-MS/ MS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%