2016
DOI: 10.4172/2169-0316.1000186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Recent Developments in Ergonomic Design and Digital Human Models

Abstract: Background: Ergonomic interventions and ergonomic redesign are researched upon today in the realms of 'Prevention through Design' towards addressing the occupational health and safety concerns of the industry.Objective: To review the developments over the past ten years relating to computer aided ergonomic design, and propose an ergonomic intervention framework for manufacturing systems. Methods:The literature was selected from ergonomics journals indexed in the SCOPUS bibliographic database, by filtering abst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several software packages are available today for the design and assessment of ergonomic environments: Sammie, Boeman, Jack, Anybody, Santos, HumanCAD, Ramsis, and Safework, for instance. They include parametric DHMs that can be re-sized based on stature and weight variations (Rajesh & Srinath, 2016). Although they are adaptable in terms of size when analysing reach, posture, or field of vision related to the use of interfaces, they are coarse, and they do not represent anatomical human body shapes.…”
Section: Body Shape Modelling From Static 3d Scansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several software packages are available today for the design and assessment of ergonomic environments: Sammie, Boeman, Jack, Anybody, Santos, HumanCAD, Ramsis, and Safework, for instance. They include parametric DHMs that can be re-sized based on stature and weight variations (Rajesh & Srinath, 2016). Although they are adaptable in terms of size when analysing reach, posture, or field of vision related to the use of interfaces, they are coarse, and they do not represent anatomical human body shapes.…”
Section: Body Shape Modelling From Static 3d Scansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five questions in this part focused on two indicators: Ergonomic criteria used for maintainability analysis and ergonomic assessment tools used to evaluate those criteria (Table 1). We reviewed various studies and listed the potential HFE criteria (Mali & Vyavahare, 2015;Neumann, 2006;Rajesh & Srinath, 2016). Then, the HFE and maintainability experts discussed the relevancy of these indicators based on the practice of maintainability.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this can be avoided if the products are designed considering ergonomics from the initial design phase (Kuber & Rashedi, 2020;Sagot, Gouin, & Gomes, 2003). This horsebefore-the-cart approach is known as Product Ergonomics (Bhatia, Kalra, & Singh, 2016;Raghunathan & R, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%