2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-318x.2010.01079.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of rainfall frequency estimation methods

Abstract: This review outlines nationwide methods for point rainfall frequency estimation currently in use in nine different countries:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the UK, the industry standard for flood event return period analysis follows the Flood Estimation Handbook (FEH) flood frequency curve approach which is based on fitting a Generalised Extreme Value (GEV) or Generalised Logistic (GL) function [22] to annual maximum (AM) flow series. However, other popular methods include the Generalised Pareto (GP) distribution function which is fitted on peak-over-threshold (POT) series [23][24][25]. Methods based on AM or POT series have well-known advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Extreme Values Assessment and Automating Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the UK, the industry standard for flood event return period analysis follows the Flood Estimation Handbook (FEH) flood frequency curve approach which is based on fitting a Generalised Extreme Value (GEV) or Generalised Logistic (GL) function [22] to annual maximum (AM) flow series. However, other popular methods include the Generalised Pareto (GP) distribution function which is fitted on peak-over-threshold (POT) series [23][24][25]. Methods based on AM or POT series have well-known advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Extreme Values Assessment and Automating Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IDF curves are based on fitting a theoretical probability distribution to shortduration (sub-hourly, hourly, and daily) annual maximum precipitation (AMP). The approach can be implemented both locally (at site) or regionally (Svensson and Jones, 2010; regional frequency analysis (RFA) or pooled). The RFA is used when available record lengths are short or at locations where no observed data are available (Castellarin et al, 2012;Komi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They find that the ratio scale/location σ/µ, and, as a consequence, the coefficient of variation, increase with decreasing duration, concluding that a simple scaling formula cannot hold. In other works (Borga et al, 2005;Svensson and Jones, 2010), 5. Maps of the estimated GEV parameters ε (location, left) α (scale, centre) and ξ (shape, right), all dimensionless.…”
Section: Depth-duration-frequency Curves and Scale Invariancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most methods are based on parameter estimation of Gumbel or GEV distribution and make use of a growth curve to relate a statistical rainfall index to a design rainfall/flood estimate (indexflood method). What is of interest for the present work is that many methods reviewed by Svensson and Jones (2010) make use of some form of regionalisation, either by spatially interpolating the distribution parameters after estimation at station points, or by using together data from homogeneous areas, either defined by geographical boundaries, or centred around a location of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation