1985
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0426(1985)002<0404:rorhat>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Radiosonde Humidity and Temperature Errors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The large amplitudes are 1 m s Ϫ1 for winds, 1°C for temperature, and 5% for relative humidity, and the small amplitudes are 0.5 m s Ϫ1 for winds, 0.5°C for temperature, and 2.5% for relative humidity. These amplitudes are comparable to estimates of observational error for these fields (e.g., Pratt 1985;Nuss and Brown 1987). For the final two members, lateral boundary conditions receive large (LBCL) or small (LBCS) perturbations instead of the initial conditions.…”
Section: Simulationssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The large amplitudes are 1 m s Ϫ1 for winds, 1°C for temperature, and 5% for relative humidity, and the small amplitudes are 0.5 m s Ϫ1 for winds, 0.5°C for temperature, and 2.5% for relative humidity. These amplitudes are comparable to estimates of observational error for these fields (e.g., Pratt 1985;Nuss and Brown 1987). For the final two members, lateral boundary conditions receive large (LBCL) or small (LBCS) perturbations instead of the initial conditions.…”
Section: Simulationssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…time lag of the hygristor in adjusting to temperature changes of the ambient air and heating of the hygristor and adjacent layer of air by solar radiation [Pratt, 1985]. Although the source of errors is partly corrected (or at least improved) [Elliot and Gaffen, 1991], this experiment is still valuable to obtain implications for case studies using the old data sets.…”
Section: Radiosonde Error Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most contemporary radiosonde instruments show extremely low performance in measuring relative humidity (RH), especially at cold and dry regions [Pratt, 1985 vapor is a major ingredient in nonlinear interactions among complex microphysical processes in cloud. The strong nonlinearity imposed by the vapor perturbations can effectively contribute to the growth and decay of perturbations in other variables and change dynamical evolution of the storm, and thus affect its predictability significantly.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison of GOES retrievals to radiosonde measurements is not ideal due to differing measurement characteristics (point volumetric), collocation errors (matches are restricted to 0.25°), time differences (within 1 h), and radiosonde errors (Pratt 1985;Schmidlin 1988). However, it has become the standard approach for GOES sounding validation.…”
Section: A Soundingsmentioning
confidence: 99%