1983
DOI: 10.1109/tsmc.1983.6313123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of pseudoinverse control for use with kinematically redundant manipulators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
372
0
4

Year Published

1989
1989
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,004 publications
(377 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
372
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, difficulties arise from the selection of this inverse, as Klein and Huang (1983) and Mussa-Ivaldi and Hogan (1991) discuss in the context of the control of a robotic arm. In particular, the MP pseudoinverse does not produce the same articulator configuration each time it returns to a given point in the planning space.…”
Section: Approximate Invariance Of Constriction Locations and Degreesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, difficulties arise from the selection of this inverse, as Klein and Huang (1983) and Mussa-Ivaldi and Hogan (1991) discuss in the context of the control of a robotic arm. In particular, the MP pseudoinverse does not produce the same articulator configuration each time it returns to a given point in the planning space.…”
Section: Approximate Invariance Of Constriction Locations and Degreesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On a kinematic level, the most common approach is to use a Jacobian-based method as a mapping from operational to joint space [4]- [6]. In particular, the pseudo-inverse Jacobian is defined for systems that are not square or have full rank, and is a widely used solution to the inverse kinematics problem [7]- [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. For redundant manipulators, J is not square, but both the Newton-Raphson and differential-equations-based approaches can be extended to redundant manipulators using J + , the pseudo-inverse [9], or the weighted pseudo-inverse in place of J −1 [8,16].…”
Section: Numerical Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%