44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 2006
DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Propellant Gauging Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concentration (and hence the mass of the propellant) profile within the vessel is derived from the permittivity distribution inside the ECT sensor, which is calculated from the inter-electrode capacitance measurements. As mentioned above, an 8-segment array yields 28 independent capacitance pairs for each measurement plane-pairs (1,1,2), (1,1,3), (1,1,4), (1,1,5), (1,1,6), (1,1,7), (1,1,8), (1,2,1),…, (1,7,8) for plane 1 and (2,1,2), (2,1,3),…, (2,7,8) for plane 2, where the electrode pairs are plane, driven segment, and receiving segment.…”
Section: Electrical Capacitance Tomography (Ect)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The concentration (and hence the mass of the propellant) profile within the vessel is derived from the permittivity distribution inside the ECT sensor, which is calculated from the inter-electrode capacitance measurements. As mentioned above, an 8-segment array yields 28 independent capacitance pairs for each measurement plane-pairs (1,1,2), (1,1,3), (1,1,4), (1,1,5), (1,1,6), (1,1,7), (1,1,8), (1,2,1),…, (1,7,8) for plane 1 and (2,1,2), (2,1,3),…, (2,7,8) for plane 2, where the electrode pairs are plane, driven segment, and receiving segment.…”
Section: Electrical Capacitance Tomography (Ect)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement of the mass of the propellant in a spacecraft tank under low or zero gravity conditions remains a significant technical goal. Reference [1] reviews the three most popular techniques, book-keeping, PVT, and thermal propellant gauging (PGS) showing that each has advantages and disadvantages-book-keeping cannot determine load in a multitank configuration when tanks are connected, and PVT accuracy decreases when the amount of the propellant in the tank decreases, while PGS has errors proportional to fill level-so that different methods may be needed at different stages of life. This strong unfulfilled technical need is demonstrated by [2] which gives details of 15 different measurement techniques and seven separate technology development programs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Propellant quantity was calculated using two different methods ( Figure 5). In the "tank" model, propellant quantity was calculated based on tank pressure and temperatures.…”
Section: A Hydrazinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is utilized in specific instances as a tank nears depletion. This method, discussed further in Yendler, 3 is not included in this report.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%