Review of prevalence data in, and evaluation of methods for cross cultural adaptation of, UK surveys on tobacco and alcohol in ethnic minority groups

Abstract

Objective To assess the adequacy of cross cultural adaptations of survey questions on self reported tobacco and alcohol consumption in the United Kingdom. Design Assessment of consistency of data between studies identified through literature review. Studies evaluated with 12 guidelines developed from the research literature on achieving cross cultural comparability. Results The literature review identified 18 key studies, five of them on national samples. Survey instruments were obtained for 15 of these. The comparison of prevalence data in national surveys showed some important discrepancies, greater for tobacco than for alcohol. For example, prevalence of cigarette smoking in Bangladeshi women was 6% in a national survey in 1994 and 1% in a national survey in 1999; in Chinese men it was 31% in a survey in 1993-4 and 17% in one in 1999; in African-Caribbean men it was 29% in a 1992 survey and 42% in one in 1993-4. The most guidelines met by any study was three, although one study partly met a fourth. Two studies met no guidelines. Only four studies consulted with ethnic minority communities in developing the questionnaire, none checked each language version with all others, and two stated the questionnaire had not been validated. Conclusions Surveys have not followed best practice in relation to measurement of risk factors in cross cultural settings. There is inconsistency in the prevalence data on smoking provided by different major national UK studies. Users of such data should be aware of their limitations. Research is needed to help achieve linguistic equivalence of survey questions in cross cultural research.

Recommendations for translation and reliability testing of international spinal cord injury data sets

“…The most commonly cited approach to the design of a multi-lingual survey instrument is translation from a source language to one or more target languages (43). In this case, a set of unequivocally phrased questions in the source language has to be already worked out and accepted by all national coordinators represented in the project steering group (43;44).…”

“…As an alternative to the source-to-target approach, a multi-lingual survey instrument could be developed using an in parallel design (43). For instance, in the annual Eurostat social survey on Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (SILC), current practice is to provide members with a concept definition of each question (and answer), but the actual wording of the questions is left to their own discretion.…”

Children and adolescents in Germany with a migration background. Methodical aspects in the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS)

“…Um diese Fehlerquelle weitestgehend auszuschließen, wurden die übersetzten Fragebögen jeweils in die deutsche Sprache rücküber-setzt und die Bedeutungsäquivalenz der transportierten Inhalte überprüft. Der Goldstandard zur Sicherung der interkulturellen Äquivalenz sieht noch weitere Maßnahmen vor, die aber hinsichtlich ihres zeitlichen und finanziellen Aufwands nicht vertretbar waren [15,16,17]. Es blieb den Probanden nicht deutscher Herkunftssprache überlassen, einen deutschen oder einen übersetzten Fragebogen auszufüllen.…”

Methodische Standards f�r eine migrantensensible Forschung in der Epidemiologie

“…Gegebenenfalls müssen Konsistenzprü-fungen vorgenommen werden, um Messfehler (item-bias) auszuschließen und eine (kulturübergreifende) Vergleichbarkeit zu gewährleisten [26,27,28]. Es wird dabei überprüft, ob einzelne Items je nach kulturellem Hintergrund unterschiedlich interpretiert werden oder ob die Struktur der Indikatoren unter den verschiedenen Migrantengruppen gleich ist.…”