2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Practical Implications in Authentic Leadership Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study responds to a call by researchers who have argued that more empirical research is needed to understand fully the mechanisms through which AL influences employees' performance and other outcomes and to expand the nomological network for AL (Arda et al, 2016;Avolio and Mhatre, 2012;Gardner et al, 2011;Leroy et al, 2012;Mubarak and Noor, 2018). This research also represents an important opportunity for legitimizing the authenticity in leadership, in both the scholarly and practitioner context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The study responds to a call by researchers who have argued that more empirical research is needed to understand fully the mechanisms through which AL influences employees' performance and other outcomes and to expand the nomological network for AL (Arda et al, 2016;Avolio and Mhatre, 2012;Gardner et al, 2011;Leroy et al, 2012;Mubarak and Noor, 2018). This research also represents an important opportunity for legitimizing the authenticity in leadership, in both the scholarly and practitioner context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Thus, this study responds to calls in the literature for more empirical research examining how AL influences employee outcomes, expanding AL theory’s nomological network, and assessing this concept’s validity and stability across culturally diverse samples (Arda, Aslan, & Alpkan, 2016; Avolio & Mhatre, 2012; Gardner, Cogliser, Davis, & Dickens, 2011; Hsieh & Wang, 2015; Leroy et al, 2012; Rego, Vitória, Magalhães, Ribeiro, & Cunha, 2013; Walumbwa et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of authentic leadership has increased due to the need for reliable and transparent leadership . According to Neff and Harter (2002), authentic leadership is described shortly as being honest with oneself, but it is known that there are other factors rather than honesty, such as self-confidence and optimism (Arda et al, 2016;Ilies, Morgeson, & Nargang, 2005;Shamir & Eilam, 2005). This type of leader is consistent with what they say and what they do (Simons, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%