2020
DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i15.3188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of possible psychological impacts of COVID-19 on frontline medical staff and reduction strategies

Abstract: Like soldiers, frontline medical staff provide a first line of defense and have played a critical role in responses to the outbreak of coronavirus disease-2019 in December 2019. It is important to acknowledge the considerable pressure placed on frontline medical staff in the face of a new type of coronavirus that is highly infectious and for which no specific treatment is available. Here, we review the various kinds of psychological problems afflicting frontline medical staff who are combatting the severe acut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, our results confirm the relevance of extended support of hospital staff, of which PSU might be one modality. Long-term follow-up is all the more important because, in the case of SARS-CoV-1, PTSD symptoms have been described in healthcare providers several years after the epidemic in China, Hong Kong and Canada [29] , [30] , [31] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, our results confirm the relevance of extended support of hospital staff, of which PSU might be one modality. Long-term follow-up is all the more important because, in the case of SARS-CoV-1, PTSD symptoms have been described in healthcare providers several years after the epidemic in China, Hong Kong and Canada [29] , [30] , [31] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is necessary to update research evidence in a timely manner and track the changes in the mental health of HWs. Some studies provided only a qualitative description of existing literature as part of their narrative evaluations or general reviews (Barello et al, 2020;Bohlken et al, 2020;Braquehais et al, 2020;Chow et al, 2020;Fu et al, 2020;Heath et al, 2020;Magill et al, 2020;Muller et al, 2020;Paiano et al, 2020;Preti et al, 2020;Shaukat et al, 2020;Shreffler et al, 2020;Stuijfzand et al, 2020). Moreover, these studies neglected to include a quantitative evaluation of the strength, quality, and consistency of existing evidence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is primarily due to the fact that medical personnel, working in COVID-hospitals, experience psychological conflicts, being torn between the responsibilities of caring and treating infected patients and ensuring their own safety. As a result of the growing number of COVID-19 infection cases among their colleagues, the development and impact of psychological distress on these people has become significant [34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%