2000
DOI: 10.1144/gsl.sp.2000.179.01.09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Nd isotopic data and xenocrystic and detrital zircon ages from the pre-Variscan basement in the eastern Bohemian Massif: speculations on palinspastic reconstructions

Abstract: Nd crustal residence ages combined with xenocrystic and detrital zircon ages of Neoproterozoic and early Palaeozoic granitoid gneisses and metasediments from the NE Bohemian Massif (West Sudetes and Erzgebirge) suggest an origin from a basement with significant Grenvillian and Svecofennian-Birimian Amazonian age components. Large contributions from Archaean crust appear to be missing. Nd model ages of 1.4-1.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
46
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
5
46
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Inherited zircons from protoliths of Ordovician granitoids from Gory Sowie, in the eastern Bohemian Massif, yielded ages of 1.1 -1.3, 1.6-1.8, and 2.2 -2.6 Ga with a scatter of 0.86 -1.56-Ga Nd model ages (Kröner and Hegner, 1998). Hegner and Kröner (2000) report mainly 1.7 -1.4-Ga Nd model ages for the areas of the northeastern Bohemian Massif, and U -Pb ages of detrital zircons or zircon xenocrysts clustering from 600 to 850 Ma, 1.0 to 1.3 Ga, and 1.7 to 2.3 Ga. Following the model of Fernández-Suárez et al (2000), they place most of the source areas in an active margin setting along the Amazonian craton, only few areas showing Grenvillian sources.…”
Section: Provenance Of Detrital Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Inherited zircons from protoliths of Ordovician granitoids from Gory Sowie, in the eastern Bohemian Massif, yielded ages of 1.1 -1.3, 1.6-1.8, and 2.2 -2.6 Ga with a scatter of 0.86 -1.56-Ga Nd model ages (Kröner and Hegner, 1998). Hegner and Kröner (2000) report mainly 1.7 -1.4-Ga Nd model ages for the areas of the northeastern Bohemian Massif, and U -Pb ages of detrital zircons or zircon xenocrysts clustering from 600 to 850 Ma, 1.0 to 1.3 Ga, and 1.7 to 2.3 Ga. Following the model of Fernández-Suárez et al (2000), they place most of the source areas in an active margin setting along the Amazonian craton, only few areas showing Grenvillian sources.…”
Section: Provenance Of Detrital Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There is no zircon phase which can be clearly attributed to a Mesoproterozoic episode, such as for example the Grenvillian zircons reported from the Bohemian Massif or the Mid-German Crystalline Rise (Gebauer et al 1989;Zeh et al 2001;Linnemann et al 2000;Hegner et al 2000;Friedl et al 2000). This 'Mesoproterozoic gap' is typical for Gondwana sediment sources such as for example the West Africa Craton (WAC; e.g.…”
Section: Discussion Of General Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Variscan fold belt detritus ages have been successfully used to detect ancient terranes and to reconstruct the geodynamic and geotectonic evolution of Europe during the Palaeozoic (e.g. Franke 2000;Hegner and Kro¨ner 2000;Linnemann et al 2000;So¨llner et al 1997;Tichomirova et al 2001;von Raumer et al 2002von Raumer et al , 2003. The contribution of detrital zircon dating is most important in the understanding of the internal parts of orogens where complex internal nappe structures and high-grade metamorphism often impede the application of palaeomagnetic, stratigraphic and palaeontological methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Neoproterozoic protolith ages of 540-580 Ma are typical of granitoids and orthogneisses of the Brunovistulian (van Breemen et al 1982;Scharbert and Batík 1985;Fritz et al 1996;Friedl et al 2000Friedl et al , 2004; see Leichmann and Höck 2008 for review) as well as Saxothuringian and Lugian domains (Hegner and Kröner 2000;Tichomirowa et al 2001;Linnemann et al 2008 and references therein) and they only rarely appear as protolith ages of Moldanubian orthogneisses (Schulmann et al 2005). Importantly, Cambrian ages of 500-520 Ma are absent in the Moravo-Silesian Domain (Brunia), but they are known as the most frequent protolith ages of the Moldanubian orthogneisses, as well as of some ortho gneisses in the Saxothuringian and Lugian domains (Vrána and Kröner 1995;Hegner and Kröner 2000;Tichomirowa et al 2001;Friedl et al 2004;Schulmann et al 2005). Zircons of this age found in the studied samples can be interpreted either as clastic grains coming directly from eroded Cambrian granitoids or volcanics, or they represent recycled crystals from sediments rich in clastic material of Cambrian age.…”
Section: Geochronological Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zircons of this age found in the studied samples can be interpreted either as clastic grains coming directly from eroded Cambrian granitoids or volcanics, or they represent recycled crystals from sediments rich in clastic material of Cambrian age. Ages older than 650 Ma are known from xenocrystic cores of younger zircons in Brunovistulian, Saxothuringian and Lugian orthogneisses as well as from orthogneisses and granulites of the Moldanubian Domain (Hegner and Kröner 2000;Kröner et al 2000;Tichomirowa et al 2001;Friedl et al 2004 and references therein).…”
Section: Geochronological Datamentioning
confidence: 99%