2016
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4072.4.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of morphometric measurements used in anuran species descriptions and recommendations for a standardized approach

Abstract: Standardization and repeatability is at the heart of all scientific research, yet very little literature exists to standardize morphometric measurements within vertebrate groups. This is particularly true for amphibians. Our study attempts to rectify this lack of methodological standardization for the measurement of morphological characters in anurans through an extensive literature survey of 136 species descriptions representing 45 currently recognized families of frogs. The survey revealed 42 morphological m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
67
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Eleven traits were measured following Watters et al (2016): snout-vent length (SVL), thigh length (THL), foot length (FL), head length (HL), head width (HW), eye diameter (ED), tibia length (TL) (= shank length), tympanum diameter (TD), eye-nostril distance (END), and disc diameters of third finger (3FD) and fourth toe (4TD).…”
Section: Morphometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eleven traits were measured following Watters et al (2016): snout-vent length (SVL), thigh length (THL), foot length (FL), head length (HL), head width (HW), eye diameter (ED), tibia length (TL) (= shank length), tympanum diameter (TD), eye-nostril distance (END), and disc diameters of third finger (3FD) and fourth toe (4TD).…”
Section: Morphometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sex of individuals was determined by presence of nuptial spines on finger and chest in males in breeding condition. The terminology and methods followed Fei et al (2009) and Watters et al (2016). Measurements were taken with a dial caliper to 0.1 mm.…”
Section: Morphological Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note: this is measured along the jaw, and not parallel to the longitudinal axis of the animal), ED (horizontal eye diameter), END (eye-nostril distance, from the anterior eye to the posterior of the naris), NSD (nostril-snout tip distance, from the centre of the naris), NND (internarial distance, from the centre of each naris), TDH (horizontal tympanum diameter), TDV (vertical tympanum diameter), HAL (hand length, from the carpal-radioulnar articulation to the tip of the longest finger), LAL (lower arm length, from the carpal-radioulnar articulation to the radioulna-humeral articulation), UAL (upper arm length, from the radioulna-humeral articulation to the trunk, measured along the posterior aspect of the arm), FORL (forelimb length, given by the sum of HAL, LAL, and UAL), FOL (foot length, from the tarsal-metatarsal articulation to the tip of the longest toe), TARL (tarsal length, from the tarsal-metatarsal articulation to the tarsal-tibiofibular articulation), FOTL (foot length including tarsus, given by the sum of FOL and TARL), TIBL (tibiofibula length, from the femoral-tibiofibular articulation to the tarsal-tibiofibular articulation), TIBW (maximum tibiofibula [=shank] width), THIL (thigh length, from the vent to the femoral-tibiofibular articulation), THIW (thigh width at thickest point, measured in supine position), HIL (hindlimb length, given by the sum FOL, TARL, TIBL, and THIL), IMCL (maximum length of inner metacarpal tubercle), IMTL (maximum length of the inner metatarsal tubercle). For a figure of the application of this scheme, readers are referred to Scherz et al (2015b); for the sake of consistency, we here retain the abbreviations we have used previously instead of those proposed by Watters et al (2016). A table including all morphological measurements is provided as Appendix 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%