Residue Reviews 1985
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-5132-3_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Methods for the Determination of Ethylenethiourea (Imidazolidine-2-Thione) Residues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Techniques such as HPLC and GC were applied for the separation of ETU from other chemicals, and UV, MS, electrochemical and NPD detectors were used for its quantification (reviewed in [6,16]). The majority of these methods were developed for the determination of ETU in water or in complex matrices such as fruits and vegetables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Techniques such as HPLC and GC were applied for the separation of ETU from other chemicals, and UV, MS, electrochemical and NPD detectors were used for its quantification (reviewed in [6,16]). The majority of these methods were developed for the determination of ETU in water or in complex matrices such as fruits and vegetables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many papers have described methods for the determination of ETU and the earlier literature has been reviewed by Bottomley et al (1985) and Lentza-Rizos (1990). However, other workers have often commented on the unsatisfactory performance of many of the reported methods (Nitz et al 1982;Krause 1989a;Ahmad et al 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, other workers have often commented on the unsatisfactory performance of many of the reported methods (Nitz et al 1982;Krause 1989a;Ahmad et al 1995). Extraction from plant material has most frequently been accomplished with MeOH, EtOH or MeOH-water, although CHCl 3 -EtOH has also been employed (Bottomley et al 1985;Lentza-Rizos 1990). The AOAC Official Method (AOAC 1995) involves extraction by blending sample and diatomaceous earth with MeOH-water after the addition of NaCl.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'-5 The methods of analysis of ETU in foodstuffs, biological fluids, and other substrates have recently been reviewed. 6 The most widely used method,' which has been adopted as a AOAC official method,' is gas-liquid chromatography of the S-* Presented at the Symposium on Modern Techniques in Trace Analysis of Pesticides organised by the butyl derivative of ETU with flame photometric detection. However, the reaction and work-up required are time-consuming, and some workers have found that the derivative is unstable, giving rise to erratic results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the reaction and work-up required are time-consuming, and some workers have found that the derivative is unstable, giving rise to erratic results. 6 High performance liquid chromatography with photometricg-' ' or electrochemical detection,'2.' provides an alternative which avoids the necessity for producing a volatile derivative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%