1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf00314794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of methods and criteria for the evaluation of bioequivalence studies

Abstract: Guidelines for the performance and analysis of bioequivalence studies are not very specific. The advantages and disadvantages of the following methods and tests are discussed: analysis of variance by summation or by use of general linear models, nonparametric procedures, aposteriori probabilities and tests on the normality of residuals and on the variability of the results. Arguments for or against an analysis of data after logarithmic transformation versus analysis of untransformed data are presented. If the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The variance associated with the pharmacokinetic parameters increases as their mean value increases. Therefore, a log transformation was applied to the data in order to satisfy the constant variance assumption for the analysis of variance [8]. All statistical tests were carried out at the 5% level of significance and comparisons were made with respect to the group of extensive metabolisers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variance associated with the pharmacokinetic parameters increases as their mean value increases. Therefore, a log transformation was applied to the data in order to satisfy the constant variance assumption for the analysis of variance [8]. All statistical tests were carried out at the 5% level of significance and comparisons were made with respect to the group of extensive metabolisers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…dose in the thigh region. According to (Pabst and Jaeger 1990), sampling continued for 3-5 biological half-lives in order to obtain correct pharmacokinetic parameters from plasma-concentration (C-T) curves. FivemL lithium heparinised vacutainer tubes and 22-G disposable needles were used for collection of 2 mL of blood at each bleeding point at the following intervals: 0.083, 0.167, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 (Phase-I); and at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 (Phase-II).…”
Section: Drug Administration and Blood Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the occurrence of product effect indicates that there is a statistically significant difference between bioavailabilities of test and reference products regarding extension of drug absorption, but there is no difference regarding absorption rate, since no product effect was observed for C max . This difference in extension of drug absorption is not considered to be clinically important, since 90% CI is within the limits established by regulatory agencies (Pabst, Jaeger, 1990;Westlake, 1979). A period effect measures the differences between study periods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%