1990
DOI: 10.1016/0308-9126(90)91892-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of magnetic methods for nondestructive evaluation (Part 2)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…If the material presents any discontinuity on its surface or interior, the external magnetic field will be disturbed, being the type of disturbance dependent on various factors, such as the intensity of the magnetic field applied, the geometry of the defect, the type of material, etc. [18,19], as shown in Fig. 4.…”
Section: Tests With Mfl Pigmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…If the material presents any discontinuity on its surface or interior, the external magnetic field will be disturbed, being the type of disturbance dependent on various factors, such as the intensity of the magnetic field applied, the geometry of the defect, the type of material, etc. [18,19], as shown in Fig. 4.…”
Section: Tests With Mfl Pigmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The sensors can measure axial, radial or circumferential (tangential) field components of the leakage magnetic fields, although in practice only one component is usually measured (Jiles, 1990). The magnetization can be continuous (Singh et al, 2009), pulsed (Sophian et al, 2006;Wilson and Tian, 2007) or residual (Babbar and Clapham, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the most common nondestructive techniques are electromagnetic, ultrasonic and liquid penetrant testing [2]. However, the use of Eddy Current Testing (ECT) is one of the most widespread electromagnetic techniques for the inspection of conducting materials [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%