1989
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9201(89)90213-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of magnetic and electric field effects near active faults and volcanoes in the U.S.A.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analysis is based on differential measurements between the two permanent observatories of L'Aquila and Duronia in order to minimize the contamination from multiple sources, such as the local background noise and the magnetic field of external origin. Many experimental and theoretical studies on the electromagnetic phenomena associated with earthquakes in the frequency range from ULF to HF have been reported, see Varotsos et al, 1984a, b, Bernardi et al, 1991Fenoglio et al, 1995;Fraser-Smith et al, 1990, 1993Gershenzon et al, 1989;Gokhberg et al 1982;Hayakawa et al, 1996;Johnston et al, 1987Johnston et al, , 1989Johnston et al, , 1994Johnston et al, , 1997Merzer et al, 1997;Molchanov et al, 1992Molchanov et al, , 1995Nagano et al, 1975;Parrot et al, 1989;Park et al, 1991Park et al, , 1993Palangio et al, 2007Palangio et al, , 2008. These studies focus on different aspects including variations in quasi-static electric and magnetic fields, telluric potentials, ULF magnetic fields, alternating electric fields in the ULF, ELF and VLF bands, and variations in the ground resistivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analysis is based on differential measurements between the two permanent observatories of L'Aquila and Duronia in order to minimize the contamination from multiple sources, such as the local background noise and the magnetic field of external origin. Many experimental and theoretical studies on the electromagnetic phenomena associated with earthquakes in the frequency range from ULF to HF have been reported, see Varotsos et al, 1984a, b, Bernardi et al, 1991Fenoglio et al, 1995;Fraser-Smith et al, 1990, 1993Gershenzon et al, 1989;Gokhberg et al 1982;Hayakawa et al, 1996;Johnston et al, 1987Johnston et al, , 1989Johnston et al, , 1994Johnston et al, , 1997Merzer et al, 1997;Molchanov et al, 1992Molchanov et al, , 1995Nagano et al, 1975;Parrot et al, 1989;Park et al, 1991Park et al, , 1993Palangio et al, 2007Palangio et al, , 2008. These studies focus on different aspects including variations in quasi-static electric and magnetic fields, telluric potentials, ULF magnetic fields, alternating electric fields in the ULF, ELF and VLF bands, and variations in the ground resistivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decades, there have been many observation reports of electromagnetic disturbances in the frequency range of 10 -3 to 10 8 Hz before large earthquakes (e.g., Kalashnikov 1954;Johnston 1989;Parrot 1990;Hayakawa and Molchanov 2008). Among them, disturbance signals at the ELF range below 10 Hz were featured in several studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since fluctuations are present even when no volcanic activity is apparently affecting the signal (e.g. Johnston, 1989;Zlotnicki et al, 2000;Del Negro et al, 2004) it is evident that external sources are responsible for these variations. Hence, it is necessary to correct this component in order to identify significant geophysical signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%