2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10462-017-9550-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of liver segmentation and computer assisted detection/diagnosis methods in computed tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
55
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 150 publications
6
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Dosimetry simulation showed that a mean absorbed dose to the left and right lobe when using CBCT-based lobe segmentation were 19 and 46 Gy respectively, when we aimed at delivering 40 Gy to each lobe using the CT-based LPT segmentation clinical routine. A comparison between our liver segmentation results and the accurate methods on liver segmentation reviewed by Moghbel et al [40] shows These results show that our semi-automatic liver segmentation was comparable with manual liver segmentation by an expert. Because this segmentation method is applied to a multi-modal image (PET and CT), it uses more information, and therefore, its segmentations could even be slightly superior.…”
Section: Validation Of Liver Segmentationsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dosimetry simulation showed that a mean absorbed dose to the left and right lobe when using CBCT-based lobe segmentation were 19 and 46 Gy respectively, when we aimed at delivering 40 Gy to each lobe using the CT-based LPT segmentation clinical routine. A comparison between our liver segmentation results and the accurate methods on liver segmentation reviewed by Moghbel et al [40] shows These results show that our semi-automatic liver segmentation was comparable with manual liver segmentation by an expert. Because this segmentation method is applied to a multi-modal image (PET and CT), it uses more information, and therefore, its segmentations could even be slightly superior.…”
Section: Validation Of Liver Segmentationsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Image registration accuracy has been investigated for CT to CT liver registration for contrast-enhanced diagnostic CTs [38]. Over the past decade, numerous semi-automatic and automatic approaches for liver segmentation [39,40] on CT that rely on histogrambased methods [41,42], graph cut [43][44][45], region growing [45][46][47], geometric deformable model and level set [48][49][50], probabilistic atlas [51,52], statistical shape models [53][54][55], and recently neural network [56][57][58][59] have been proposed. Despite these efforts, image registration and segmentation remains a challenging task for SIRT application for several reasons: (1) liver is a soft tissue and liver shape is heavily dependent on patient positioning (e.g., the position of the arms); (2) the liver shape in SIRT patients differs from the normal shape, because of preceding treatments (liver resection, liver ablation, chemotherapy) and tumor growth which makes it challenging to use liver segmentation techniques which are dependent on the liver shape for these patients; (3) liver is a soft tissue and its Hounsfield units are similar to those of adjacent organs like the heart, spleen, stomach, and kidney, which makes liver segmentation on non-contrast-enhanced CTs (e.g., CT from MAA study) hard, even for experts; (4) CT from MAA study is not a dedicated diagnostic CT, this low-dose CT usually suffers from streak artifacts; and (5) the interval between the MAA study and the diagnostic high-dose, contrast-enhanced CT from from fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ( 18 F-FDG) PET/CT study can be up to weeks to even 1 or 2 months and the liver can deform dramatically over time for several reasons, e.g., tumor change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…X. M. Li tumors, which may increase the noise inside the images on the liver region [3]. Compared with liver segmentation, liver tumor segmentation is considered to be a more challenging task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though thermography imaging has its own limitations in terms of sensitivity and specificity and it is dependent on experiment qualification, it provides important information about the physiological situation of the breast (Moghbel and Mashohor, 2013). Unfortunatly, The risk of getting breast cancer has tripled since the bygone half century with respect to modification of lifestyle and other factors (Long and Beales, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%