2018
DOI: 10.1111/joes.12299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Literature on Working Capital Management and Future Research Agenda

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to take a stock of what has been studied on working capital management (WCM) so far and ascertain the factors which are more likely to be impacted by poor WCM. Moreover, it aims to spell out the areas for further research on WCM so that the body of knowledge can be expanded. A systematic literature review of the research works on WCM has been performed using Google Scholar. Articles with citations of 50 and above as of June 05, 2018 are considered for the detailed citation based an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
53
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(174 reference statements)
4
53
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The divergence can be explained by different measures used for working capital: cash conversion cycle (Dalci et al 2019;Shrivastava et al 2017;Ukaegbu 2014), most popular indicator used as proxy, net trade cycle (Baños-Caballero et al 2014) or other measures (Inventory Turnover Ratio, Working Capital Turnover Ratio). Using these measures, in most of the studies, working capital is expressed as a composite measure (Prasad et al 2019), but there are also a few studies that have examined the impact of working capital on profit, at the level of individual components of cash conversion cycle or net trade cycle (Enqvist et al 2014). Moreover, Mahmood et al (2019) provide several reasons to explain why companies may exhibit a different working capital-profitability: ownership structures, financial flexibility, tax provisions, and leverage.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The divergence can be explained by different measures used for working capital: cash conversion cycle (Dalci et al 2019;Shrivastava et al 2017;Ukaegbu 2014), most popular indicator used as proxy, net trade cycle (Baños-Caballero et al 2014) or other measures (Inventory Turnover Ratio, Working Capital Turnover Ratio). Using these measures, in most of the studies, working capital is expressed as a composite measure (Prasad et al 2019), but there are also a few studies that have examined the impact of working capital on profit, at the level of individual components of cash conversion cycle or net trade cycle (Enqvist et al 2014). Moreover, Mahmood et al (2019) provide several reasons to explain why companies may exhibit a different working capital-profitability: ownership structures, financial flexibility, tax provisions, and leverage.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted by Prasad, Narayanasamy, Paul, Chattopadhyay, and Saravanan (2019), empirical literature analyzing the effect of WCM on firm profitability has become highly popular among academics in the last two decades (see Table 1). More specifically, 13 of the 20 references reported in Table 1, which summarizes the most important studies on the topic, were published after 2010.…”
Section: Literature Review and Proposal Of Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…or public limited companies (i.e., S.P.A.); -specific features of companies and their ability to innovate, i.e., dummy control variables indicating whether a company is an "innovative start-up" or an "innovative small medium enterprise". The analysis of working capital is relevant because it represents firms' self-financing (Shubita, 2019;Prasad et al, 2019;Gill et al, 2019). Positive values represent the financial solvency of firms in the short term, while negative results mean that some assets are financed by current liabilities.…”
Section: Empirical Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%