2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.03.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of information technology for surgical patient care

Abstract: Introduction Electronic health records (EHRs), computerized order entry (CPOE), and patient portals have experienced increased adoption by healthcare systems. The objective of this study was to review evidence regarding the impact of such health information technologies (HIT) on surgical practice. Materials and Methods A search of Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library was performed to identify data-driven, non-survey studies about the effects of HIT on surgical care. Domain experts were queried f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies suggest that there may be improvements in length of stay, mortality, inpatient rate of infections, adherence to guidelines, rate of medication errors, costs and utilization of physician time. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Other studies have reported that the introduction of EHR may result in less orders for unnecessary tests and imaging and can possibly influence confidence in diagnosis. 17,18 The difficulty in reaching a conclusion as to benefits of EHR is due to multiple factors, these include a wide spectrum of commercially available EHR systems, mixed taxonomy utilized by different studies, intrinsic site and utilization differences and an absence of standardized measure in the assessment of EHR performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some studies suggest that there may be improvements in length of stay, mortality, inpatient rate of infections, adherence to guidelines, rate of medication errors, costs and utilization of physician time. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Other studies have reported that the introduction of EHR may result in less orders for unnecessary tests and imaging and can possibly influence confidence in diagnosis. 17,18 The difficulty in reaching a conclusion as to benefits of EHR is due to multiple factors, these include a wide spectrum of commercially available EHR systems, mixed taxonomy utilized by different studies, intrinsic site and utilization differences and an absence of standardized measure in the assessment of EHR performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…International literature also remains equivocal as to the effects of EHR. Some studies suggest that there may be improvements in length of stay, mortality, inpatient rate of infections, adherence to guidelines, rate of medication errors, costs and utilization of physician time . Other studies have reported that the introduction of EHR may result in less orders for unnecessary tests and imaging and can possibly influence confidence in diagnosis …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Providers and investigators may be unfamiliar with data extraction tools and may not utilize structured data elements even when available due to difficulty in changing existing clinic workflows [31]. Implementation of discrete data elements in the operative setting may also lead to delays in operative report generation, despite potential long-term improvements in data quality and accessibility [32].…”
Section: Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Coinciding with advances in technology and web access alongside the COVID-19 pandemic, educators have sought to increase webbased information available to students, health care providers, and patients to promote and develop these resources. [5][6][7][8] However, there are disproportionately fewer open-access educational resources specifically targeted for global accessibility and consumption, such as free online videos and various surgical atlas texts. [9][10][11][12] Even with modern advances in technology improving access to medical information worldwide, the readability and quality can be variable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%