2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of household solid waste charges for developing countries – A focus on quantity-based charge methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(83 reference statements)
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, it identifies household preferences and measures the willingness to pay not only for MSW collection services, but also for the provision of service at the given date and time in each week, for which households are willing to pay additional 10-28% on top of what they pay for MSW management. Second, charging collection costs based on the volume of the waste that households generate may result in undesirable outcome of mid-night dumping in drainages and open space [32,33], determining fee based on house structure, mainly number of floors of the house as a proxy indicator of the volume of the waste may be an alternative approach, which may help cities to get additional resources for managing solid wastes properly. Third, city dwellers may collaborate with the cities for reducing the waste that goes to the dumping sites if the wastes collection service is synchronized with the households' effort of separating organic vs. other wastes, and composting the organic wastes instead of dumping in landfill sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it identifies household preferences and measures the willingness to pay not only for MSW collection services, but also for the provision of service at the given date and time in each week, for which households are willing to pay additional 10-28% on top of what they pay for MSW management. Second, charging collection costs based on the volume of the waste that households generate may result in undesirable outcome of mid-night dumping in drainages and open space [32,33], determining fee based on house structure, mainly number of floors of the house as a proxy indicator of the volume of the waste may be an alternative approach, which may help cities to get additional resources for managing solid wastes properly. Third, city dwellers may collaborate with the cities for reducing the waste that goes to the dumping sites if the wastes collection service is synchronized with the households' effort of separating organic vs. other wastes, and composting the organic wastes instead of dumping in landfill sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The global population is rapidly growing so as the associated household and in-dustrial wastes. New patterns of lifestyle characterized by high-consumption behaviors, stemmed mainly from higher per capita income, have substantially increased quantities of Municipal Solid Wastes (MSW) of which Household Solid Wastes (HSW) contribute about 75% [1]. As an example, the three North American countries Canada, the US, and Mexico altogether generate nearly 265 million tons of organic waste annually [2] of which approximately 75 million tons are diverted to industrial-scale composting activities and the remaining 190 million tons are disposed in landfills.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In doing so, the potential socio-economic benefits are numerous in terms of job creation, increase per capita GDP, and improve the environment and living conditions in cities [2]. Moreover, reducing volumes of HSW through fiscal/financial support schemes deemed a convenient approach to local authorities [1]. On this pretext, economic instruments such as collection service fees along with automated processing and sorting technology have been developed, commercialized, and implemented in many developed countries [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O rápido e constante aumento populacional e a evolução econômica têm provocado grandes desafios aos governos locais, como o crescimento na geração de resíduos sólidos urbanos (RSU) (Welivita, et al, 2015;Chong, et al, 2016;Pisani Jr, et al, 2017;Wang, et al, 2018). Ao analisar essa tendência de crescimento, a UNEP (2015), informou que as cidades começaram a gerar anualmente cerca de 2 bilhões de toneladas de RSU a partir 2015.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified