2001
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9372(2001)127:6(476)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Folklore in Design and Operation of Secondary Clarifiers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under critical loading conditions, i.e., at j410 kg?m À3 , simulation results obtained for X TSS,Eff using the Taká cs model are significantly lower than those obtained with the Pló sz model. Under moderate and low loading, i.e., at jo10 kg m À3 , Parker et al (2001) show that proper activated sludge system operation with good SST design results in average X TSS,Eff around 10 g m À3 . X TSS,Eff values obtained with the Taká cs model at jo10 kg m À3 thus suggest an overestimation of a properly designed and functioning SST effluent quality.…”
Section: Scenario Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Under critical loading conditions, i.e., at j410 kg?m À3 , simulation results obtained for X TSS,Eff using the Taká cs model are significantly lower than those obtained with the Pló sz model. Under moderate and low loading, i.e., at jo10 kg m À3 , Parker et al (2001) show that proper activated sludge system operation with good SST design results in average X TSS,Eff around 10 g m À3 . X TSS,Eff values obtained with the Taká cs model at jo10 kg m À3 thus suggest an overestimation of a properly designed and functioning SST effluent quality.…”
Section: Scenario Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The main reason for this discrepancy is that the two conical SSTs have a 0.5-1m shallower centre-depth than the other flat bottom clarifiers studied. Parker et al (2001) show that, in a conical SST compared to a flat-bottom reactor, higher sludge blankets can develop because of (i) the development of the compressive blanket beginning from a higher elevation; (ii) sludge conveyance inefficiencies; (iii) less storage volume for the same depth in the centre.…”
Section: Scenario Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The foam formed a stable and brown layer, which stayed in the tank for several weeks, and sometimes 90% surface of aeration was covered by foaming. The height of foaming is usually more than 10 cm and SVI value closed to 350 mL g −1 (SVI values above 150 mL g −1 are typically associated with filamentous growth [19]). Bulking and foaming seldom occurred in summer and autumn, and the SVI was less than 100 mL g −1 .…”
Section: Plant Performance and Controlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With well designed clarifiers, low concentrations of effluent suspended solids (, 10 mg/L average) can be obtained (Parker et al 1996(Parker et al , 2001. Mü ller & Krauth (1998) report on an automatic control strategy to limit the storm water inflow to the aeration tank according to the actual treatment capacity, with the ammonia concentration in the nitrification zone and the sludge blanket level in the secondary clarifiers as control parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%