2008
DOI: 10.1021/ie0712941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Fluid Slip over Superhydrophobic Surfaces and Its Dependence on the Contact Angle

Abstract: A review of the characteristics of hydrophobicity is presented, with the goal of investigating the relationship, if any, between the contact angle (a macroscopically observed property) and the slip length (a microscopic phenomenon). An analysis of simulations, and of their evolution through the years, sheds light on some inherent differences between contact angle and slip length behavior on flat and patterned surfaces. Previous studies lead to the conclusion that epitaxial layering of fluid near the solid is i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
157
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 264 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 182 publications
3
157
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the last decade interest in the potential application of superhydrophobic surfaces for drag reduction has grown (Neto et al 2005;Voronov, Papavassiliou & Lee 2008;Quéré 2008;Vinogradova & Dubov 2012). Superhydrophobic surfaces are structured surfaces with micro-or nano-scale roughness that have a hydrophobic surface chemistry (McHale, Newton & Shirtcliffe 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last decade interest in the potential application of superhydrophobic surfaces for drag reduction has grown (Neto et al 2005;Voronov, Papavassiliou & Lee 2008;Quéré 2008;Vinogradova & Dubov 2012). Superhydrophobic surfaces are structured surfaces with micro-or nano-scale roughness that have a hydrophobic surface chemistry (McHale, Newton & Shirtcliffe 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(5)] and thus a higher contact angle θ ∞ , but it leads to an enhanced energy barrier and thus a reduced slip length [32]. This insight may help understanding the observed controversial correlations between the contact angle and the slip length in experiments [42,44].…”
Section: Fig 2 Summarized the Contact Angles Of The Water Droplets Wmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is thus interesting to investigate the correlation between the wettability and the slip length. It is often believed that a hydrophobic surface often has a larger slip length than that of a hydrophilic surface [42].…”
Section: Fig 2 Summarized the Contact Angles Of The Water Droplets Wmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One expected difference between PDMS and PMMA resides in channel wettability. 16,17 The velocity profile measured in a microchannel with hydrophilic walls (PMMA 18 ) is different from that measured in microchannels with hydrophobic walls (PDMS): 17 hydrophobicity enhances the wall slip phenomenon, and, therefore, velocity and stress profiles within the channel cross-section will both be affected. In this regard, Graca et al 19 showed that PDMS hydrophobicity can be finely tuned by adding surfactants: even a small amount of surfactants (1 mM concentration) strongly increases channel wettability, as shown by the pronounced decrease of the measured contact angle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%