2011
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1112139108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of flow rate estimates of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill

Abstract: The unprecedented nature of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill required the application of research methods to estimate the rate at which oil was escaping from the well in the deep sea, its disposition after it entered the ocean, and total reservoir depletion. Here, we review what advances were made in scientific understanding of quantification of flow rates during deep sea oil well blowouts. We assess the degree to which a consensus was reached on the flow rate of the well by comparing in situ observations of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
318
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 467 publications
(333 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
318
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In striking contrast to the slow natural gas and oil inputs, the DWH oil discharge released 2.6-3.6 × 10 5 t gas and 5.9-8.4 × 10 5 t oil McNutt et al, 2012), exposing the Gulf's microbial populations to locally unprecedented hydrocarbon loads. The temporal impact of the deepwater plume on the native bacterial communities was surveyed between March 2010 and November 2012, in conditions hereafter termed 'pre-discharge' (PRE), 'discharge' (DUR) and 'postdischarge' (POST).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In striking contrast to the slow natural gas and oil inputs, the DWH oil discharge released 2.6-3.6 × 10 5 t gas and 5.9-8.4 × 10 5 t oil McNutt et al, 2012), exposing the Gulf's microbial populations to locally unprecedented hydrocarbon loads. The temporal impact of the deepwater plume on the native bacterial communities was surveyed between March 2010 and November 2012, in conditions hereafter termed 'pre-discharge' (PRE), 'discharge' (DUR) and 'postdischarge' (POST).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An estimated 4.1 million barrels of crude oil entered the Gulf of Mexico over a period of 84 days (20 April to 15 July 2010) (McNutt et al, 2011). One distinctive feature that set this spill apart from other historic oil spill incidents at sea was the duration of the leak and depth at which it occurred (1500 m below the sea surface).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been estimated that between 4.2 and 4.9 million barrels of oil were released making it the largest accidental oil spill in history. [1][2][3] Numerous studies have examined the fate and impact of released Macondo oil within the plume [4][5][6][7][8] , on the surface of the Gulf 5,9,10 , buried in ocean sediments (either directly or as marine snow) 6,10 , in marshes [11][12][13][14] , and on beaches. 10,12,14-19 Not surprisingly, the environmental fate of the oil was influenced by many well documented weathering processes.…”
Section: Chapter 1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] This crude oil was transformed by a number of weathering processes and eventually converted into sand patties that are largely composed of partially oxidized organic compounds termed 'oxyhydrocarbons'. 20,21,25,54 The weathered sand patties may remain on the seafloor or be transported to beaches where they can settle in the swash zone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%